2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2819-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognosis of incidental gallbladder carcinoma is not influenced by the primary access technique: analysis of 837 incidental gallbladder carcinomas in the German Registry

Abstract: The GR data, which relate to a large homogenous patient cohort, showed that when other potential influencing factors, e.g., IRR were eliminated, the primary access technique had no effect on prognosis. Stage-adjusted therapy should always be performed irrespective of the primary access technique.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, while patients with in-situ and intramucosal carcinomas are all alive after a mean follow-up of 69 months, T2 and T3 lesions showed, overall, an unsatisfactory prognosis with a median of 19 and 5 months for the two groups, respectively; these findings coincide with those reported by many authors [7,8,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, while patients with in-situ and intramucosal carcinomas are all alive after a mean follow-up of 69 months, T2 and T3 lesions showed, overall, an unsatisfactory prognosis with a median of 19 and 5 months for the two groups, respectively; these findings coincide with those reported by many authors [7,8,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Furthermore, the frequent occurrence of the gallbladder carcinoma in the seventh and eighth life decade [3] (8 patients in our group are more than 75 years old) could make problematic the indication to a demanding surgical procedure comprising an extended liver resection and nodal dissection, in which are described postoperative complication rates up to 30-40% [8,9], even in the more recent literature [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in gallbladder carcinoma invading the subserosal layer, high rates of vascular and perineural invasion and lymph node involvement are observed [180][181][182][183][184][185]. In fact, there are many reports that have showed an additional resection improved the prognosis of patients with incidental gallbladder carcinoma [167,168,[186][187][188][189]. Therefore, an additional resection including hepatectomy and lymph node dissection should be considered for patients with incidental gallbladder carcinoma invading subserosal layer or more.…”
Section: Cq16: What Are Considered As Unresectable Factors In Biliarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current era of laparoscopic surgery, the number of IGCs found during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is increasing. Port site recurrence and peritoneal dissemination caused by intra-operative perforation of the gallbladder are inevitably associated with IGC; however, Goetze et al reported that the primary access technique had no effect on prognosis [29], and Fuks et al reported that port site resection was not associated with the improved survival of patients with IGC [30]. Because this study included only six patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, we cannot conclude whether port site resection should be performed routinely as part of ICG treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%