2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robot-assisted Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (FEVAR) Using the Magellan System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). 38 Perhaps the most exciting potential benefit of robotic angiography and intervention is the potential for remote operation by a stroke interventionist across a network of hospitals equipped with the necessary angiography infrastructure. This may dramatically broaden the geographic reach of each stroke interventionist, allowing patients with large vessel occlusions to reach a suitable treatment location even when the interventionist is farther away.…”
Section: Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). 38 Perhaps the most exciting potential benefit of robotic angiography and intervention is the potential for remote operation by a stroke interventionist across a network of hospitals equipped with the necessary angiography infrastructure. This may dramatically broaden the geographic reach of each stroke interventionist, allowing patients with large vessel occlusions to reach a suitable treatment location even when the interventionist is farther away.…”
Section: Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,6,28,38,39 Lu et al reported their initial experience with robotically assisted diagnostic angiography in 15 patients using the Vascular Interventional Robot (VIR-2; Navy General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Beijing University, China). The authors reported a mean (± SD) robotically assisted diagnostic angiography time of 34.4 ± 5.13 minutes and reported no periprocedural complications.…”
Section: Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, there has been a growing interest in robotassisted catheter navigation systems. Compared to manual catheterization, these platforms could provide advantages such as added stability and precision of motion, increased comfort for the operator, and reduced radiation from the ionizing sources [1]. However, most existing platforms have been designed without consideration of natural bedside manipulation skills and many master controllers fail to utilize the operator's experience obtained from conventional catheterization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances in both imaging and robotic technologies could provide the possibility for an enhanced robot-assisted catheterization. Learning the essential interactive behavior patterns between the catheter and blood vessels as well as between the operator and the catheter from demonstrations, incorporating anatomical information from pre-operative images, and applying them to a semiautonomous and collaborative robotic catheterization within different anatomical geometries, can reduce the cognitive 1 Wenqiang Chi, Jindong Liu, Hedyeh Rafii-Tari and Guang-Zhong Yang are with the Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, London, UK (email:wenqiang.chi10@imperial.ac.uk) 2 workload of the operator while improving the quality of the catheter insertion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manipulation of catheters through complex anatomy has undergone improved consistency and safety through the introduction of robotic catheter navigation systems such as the Hansen Magellan (Hansen Medical, Mountain View, CA, USA) for arterial intervention [1] and the Stereotaxis Niobe (Stereotaxis, St. Louis, MO, USA) for electrophysiology (EP) procedures [2]. The use of these systems has led to greater stability of the catheter, as well as better control, allowing for catheter manoeuvrability though more tortuous vessels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%