“People like numbers”: a descriptive study of cognitive assessment methods in clinical practice for Aboriginal Australians in the Northern Territory

Abstract

BackgroundAchieving culturally fair assessments of cognitive functioning for Aboriginal people is difficult due to a scarcity of appropriately validated tools for use with this group. As a result, some Aboriginal people with cognitive impairments may lack fair and equitable access to services. The objective of this study was to examine current clinical practice in the Northern Territory regarding cognitive assessment for Aboriginal people thereby providing some guidance for clinicians new to this practice setting.MethodQualitative enquiry was used to describe practice context, reasons for assessment, and current practices in assessing cognition for Aboriginal Australians. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 clinicians working with Aboriginal clients in central and northern Australia. Results pertaining to assessment methods are reported.ResultsA range of standardised tests were utilised with little consistency across clinical practice. Nevertheless, it was recognised that such tests bear severe limitations, requiring some modification and significant caution in their interpretation. Clinicians relied heavily on informal assessment or observations, contextual information and clinical judgement.ConclusionsCognitive tests developed specifically for Aboriginal people are urgently needed. In the absence of appropriate, validated tests, clinicians have relied on and modified a range of standardised and informal assessments, whilst recognising the severe limitations of these. Past clinical training has not prepared clinicians adequately for assessing Aboriginal clients, and experience and clinical judgment were considered crucial for fair interpretation of test scores. Interpretation guidelines may assist inexperienced clinicians to consider whether they are achieving fair assessments of cognition for Aboriginal clients.

Everyday uses of standardized test information in a geriatric setting: a qualitative study exploring occupational therapist and physiotherapist test administrators’ justifications

“…This practice also underlines the therapists’ pragmatic stance towards testing. A similar approach to test interpretation is found in Dingwall et al [18]. Caveats were especially important when a mismatch between patients’ observed behavior and the end score was noted.…”

Aboriginal prisoners and cognitive impairment: the impact of dual disadvantage on Social and Emotional Wellbeing

“…There is a dearth of both accessible and culturally appropriate disability services (Simpson & Sotiri ; Glasson et al ; Australian Human Rights Commission ; Productivity Commission ; VALS ; Bohanna et al ). In addition, many of the tools employed to determine cognitive impairment may be culturally inappropriate (Dingwell et al ; Dingwell et al ). Cognitive impairment can be misdiagnosed in Indigenous cohorts due to differing notions of space and time, language differences and discounting cultural conceptualisations of health (LoGiudice et al ; Australian Human Rights Commission ; Dingwell & Cairney ; Productivity Commission ; Bohanna et al ; NAAJA ).…”

“…There is a dearth of both accessible and culturally appropriate disability services (Simpson & Sotiri 2004;Glasson et al 2005;Australian Human Rights Commission 2008;Productivity Commission 2011;VALS 2011;Bohanna et al 2013). In addition, many of the tools employed to determine cognitive impairment may be culturally inappropriate (Dingwell et al 2013;Dingwell et al 2014 (Sotiri et al 2012;Dingwell et al 2014). As such, the verbal intelligence subsets of intelligence tests are sometimes discarded to avoid cultural bias (see Sattler 2001).…”

Will the National Disability Insurance Scheme Improve the Lives of those Most in Need? Effective Service Delivery for People with Acquired Brain Injury and other Disabilities in Remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Communities

“…The paucity of assessment instruments available for assessing psychosocial and cognitive functioning in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians represents a challenge to undertaking evidence‐based assessment (Dingwall and Cairney ; Dingwall, Pinkerton and Lindeman ; Sheldon ). Assessment instruments are developed to assess, through a series of questions or tasks, human behaviours, needs, thinking processes, emotions and personality characteristics (Groth‐Marnat ).…”