2013
DOI: 10.1097/igc.0b013e31827da1f6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L1 Gene Methylation in High-Risk Human Papillomaviruses for the Prognosis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Abstract: L1MR was associated with the CIN grade and indicated the HPV genome status in the host cell: high L1MR indicated HPV genome integration linked to progression from early-stage CINs, whereas low L1MR indicated an episomal HPV genome location in host cells. L1MR may be a prognostic indicator of CIN.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[19–21] HPV L1 gene was the coding gene of major capsid protein, it was found that a high level of L1 gene methylation should mean the integration status of HPV genome and host cell genome, the low level of L1 gene methylation proved that HPV genome was in free status from the host cell genome. [8] Bryant et al [22] reported that a consistent trend was existed between HPV L1 gene methylation and cell morphology changes, it could be used as a molecular target of cervical lesions’ diagnosis and treatment. So, L1 gene methylation level not only represented the status of HPV infection in cervical exfoliated cells, but also had a good correction with the cervical cell lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[19–21] HPV L1 gene was the coding gene of major capsid protein, it was found that a high level of L1 gene methylation should mean the integration status of HPV genome and host cell genome, the low level of L1 gene methylation proved that HPV genome was in free status from the host cell genome. [8] Bryant et al [22] reported that a consistent trend was existed between HPV L1 gene methylation and cell morphology changes, it could be used as a molecular target of cervical lesions’ diagnosis and treatment. So, L1 gene methylation level not only represented the status of HPV infection in cervical exfoliated cells, but also had a good correction with the cervical cell lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[47] The L1 protein as the main capsid protein of HPV played an important role to recognize the host cell and keep persistent infection, which was a good index to evaluate the infection state in host cell. [8] Previous studies showed that the quantity of L1 protein was declining with aggravate of cervical cell lesion, L1 gene was the coding gene of L1 protein, its methylation was the major reason of L1 protein decreasing, which showed positive correlation to the degree of cervical lesions. [9,10] So, L1 gene methylation deeply involved in the progression and heterogeneity of cervical lesions, which was the potential clinical molecular target of cervical lesions to early diagnose and monitor the prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantification of these changes may contribute to the diagnosis and prognostication of cervical cancer [15] . The L1 gene of HPV is preferentially methylated in cellular DNA, and this methylation is correlated with cervical precancerous progression, which may be used as a marker for detecting the grade and progression of neoplasia [16,17] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, previous studies examining the epigenetic property of HPV-16 suggest that the L1 gene presents higher methylation levels in high-grade cervical lesions compared to asymptomatic infection or low-grade lesions [26,27], similar with our study. Oka et al reported that high methylation levels indicate the DNA integration linking to the progression of disease, whereas low methylation levels indicate an episomal HPV genome status in host cells [28]. These findings demonstrate that L1 gene methylation may be a consequence of HPV genomic integration [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%