2013
DOI: 10.1111/liv.12036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adding adefovir vs. switching to entecavir for lamivudine‐resistant chronic hepatitis B (ACE study): a 2‐year follow‐up randomized controlled trial

Abstract: This study showed that adefovir-lamivudine combination provides significantly higher antiviral efficacy and the lower resistance rate compared with the entecavir monotherapy in the management of lamivudine-resistant CHB. However, it had limited efficacy in HBeAg-positive patients or in patients with high baseline HBV DNA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, according to our data, the LAM+ADV combination therapy, which is considered a preferred therapy for LAM-resistant CHB patients because it induces less drug resistance and high viral response, did not show a higher viral suppressive effect than the monotherapies considering the mean HBV DNA levels. In terms of virologic response rates, LAM+ADV combination therapy for 1 year showed undetectable HBV DNA rates of 40% to 70% in previous studies for LAM-resistant CHB patients 13,14. However, in our study, this group showed low virologic response (21.2% of patients with undetectable HBV DNA), whilst 57.1% patients in the CLV+ADV combination therapy group showed undetectable HBV DNA.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, according to our data, the LAM+ADV combination therapy, which is considered a preferred therapy for LAM-resistant CHB patients because it induces less drug resistance and high viral response, did not show a higher viral suppressive effect than the monotherapies considering the mean HBV DNA levels. In terms of virologic response rates, LAM+ADV combination therapy for 1 year showed undetectable HBV DNA rates of 40% to 70% in previous studies for LAM-resistant CHB patients 13,14. However, in our study, this group showed low virologic response (21.2% of patients with undetectable HBV DNA), whilst 57.1% patients in the CLV+ADV combination therapy group showed undetectable HBV DNA.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…This prevents us from recommending CLV+ADV combination for CLV-resistant CHB routinely. In addition, ADV has potential risk of nephrotoxicity, and one patient of our cohort displayed increase of serum creatinine 14,24. Hence CLV+ADV combination therapy can only be recommend with caution of these adverse events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Nevertheless, Chu et al revealed that the virologic response rate for children, of whom the majority had one mutation, was 37.5% at 24 weeks and 50% at 48 weeks, compared with 7.7 ∼33.3% at 24 weeks and 22.0∼54.5% at 48 weeks for adult patients, although the children had higher baseline HBV DNA load than adults [43]. Lamivudine + adefovir combination therapy has been proven to have a more potent antiviral effect than entecavir monotherapy [71,72]. Even though entecavir has a good effect on initial viral suppression, entecavir alone has a relatively high resistance rate in lamivudine-resistant patients and is considered to be less effective than lamivudine + adefovir combination therapy.…”
Section: Switch Therapy To Entecarvirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty patients were consecutively recruited from nine hospitals affiliated with seven universities between February 2010 and February 2011. Previously, we conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of ETV monotherapy versus ADV plus LMV combination therapy in 219 LMV-resistant CHB patients [16]. One hundred and nine patients received ETV 1 mg for 2 years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%