2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No association between garlic intake and risk of colorectal cancer

Abstract: Background Although experimental studies suggested beneficial role of garlic intake on colorectal carcinogenesis, limited prospective cohort studies have evaluated garlic intake in relation to colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence. Methods We followed 76,208 women in the Nurses’ Health Study and 45,592 men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study for up to 24 years and examined garlic intake and garlic supplement use in relation to CRC risk. Information on garlic intake and supplement use was assessed using a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore only fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria: seven were case-control (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28) and seven were cohort studies (29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35) (Table 1). Among the cohort studies two considered garlic supplements only (31,33) , while among the other five studies two considered garlic supplements in addition to dietary intake (34,35) . Table 1 summarizes the detailed characteristics of included studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore only fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria: seven were case-control (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28) and seven were cohort studies (29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35) (Table 1). Among the cohort studies two considered garlic supplements only (31,33) , while among the other five studies two considered garlic supplements in addition to dietary intake (34,35) . Table 1 summarizes the detailed characteristics of included studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies reported findings only for females (22,30,32) , one only for males (29) , eight for females and males together (23,(25)(26)(27)(28)31,33,34) and three presented findings for males and females separately (24,34,35) . Three studies reported results of risk for rectal cancer (22,31,35) , six for colon cancer (23,(29)(30)(31)(32)35) and eight for CRC (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(33)(34)(35) . Study-specific quality scores of each study are summarized in Supplemental Table S1 and Supplemental Table S2 for case-control and cohort studies, respectively (see online supplementary material).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, there are instances of null findings in some stand-alone cohort studies [ 18 , 19 ] and in meta-analyses evaluations of cohort studies [ 11 , 12 ]. Two cohort studies reporting a null association between garlic intake and colorectal cancer analyzed the Nurses’ Health Study, Health Professionals Follow-Up Study, and Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort [ 18 , 19 ]. It is worth noting that these studies used self-administered food frequency questionnaires and considered a serving of garlic as one clove or four shakes of garlic powder or garlic salt [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Epidemiological Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two cohort studies reporting a null association between garlic intake and colorectal cancer analyzed the Nurses’ Health Study, Health Professionals Follow-Up Study, and Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort [ 18 , 19 ]. It is worth noting that these studies used self-administered food frequency questionnaires and considered a serving of garlic as one clove or four shakes of garlic powder or garlic salt [ 18 , 19 ]. It is possible that use of garlic powder and garlic salt within these studies accounted for intake without providing the same protective effect as fresh garlic cloves [ 18 , 20 ].…”
Section: Epidemiological Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%