2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Offenders with antisocial personality disorder show attentional bias for violence-related stimuli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining bias scores to positive and negative images revealed that those with an offense history had a bias toward affective images. These findings are similar to that reported by others using samples of offenders who do not have intellectual disabilities (Chan et al, 2010; Ciardha & Gormley, 2012; Domes et al, 2013; Gallagher‐Duffy et al, 2009; Smith & Waterman, 2003, 2004). In addition, and as reported by others, men with intellectual disabilities and a history of offending endorsed more distorted cognitions (Daniel et al, 2018; Langdon & Talbot, 2006; Langdon, Murphy, et al, 2011; Lindsay & Michie, 2004; Lindsay et al, 2006), and reported less general empathy (Hockley & Langdon, 2015; Langdon & Hockley, 2012); however, not all previous studies have reported that men with intellectual disabilities who have a history of committing crimes score lower on measures of empathy (Beail & Proctor, 2004; Langdon, Murphy, et al, 2011; Proctor & Beail, 2007; Ralfs & Beail, 2012) than men without such a history, which is likely related to measurement and sampling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Combining bias scores to positive and negative images revealed that those with an offense history had a bias toward affective images. These findings are similar to that reported by others using samples of offenders who do not have intellectual disabilities (Chan et al, 2010; Ciardha & Gormley, 2012; Domes et al, 2013; Gallagher‐Duffy et al, 2009; Smith & Waterman, 2003, 2004). In addition, and as reported by others, men with intellectual disabilities and a history of offending endorsed more distorted cognitions (Daniel et al, 2018; Langdon & Talbot, 2006; Langdon, Murphy, et al, 2011; Lindsay & Michie, 2004; Lindsay et al, 2006), and reported less general empathy (Hockley & Langdon, 2015; Langdon & Hockley, 2012); however, not all previous studies have reported that men with intellectual disabilities who have a history of committing crimes score lower on measures of empathy (Beail & Proctor, 2004; Langdon, Murphy, et al, 2011; Proctor & Beail, 2007; Ralfs & Beail, 2012) than men without such a history, which is likely related to measurement and sampling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For those with a history of committing crimes, there is evidence that those with antisocial personality disorder have a bias toward violent words (Domes, Mense, Vohs, & Habermeyer, 2013); men and women with either a history of violent or non‐violent crimes have an attentional bias toward violent words, with those with the history of violent crime having the most marked bias (Smith & Waterman, 2003), sexual offenders have a bias toward sexual words (Price & Karl Hanson, 2007; Smith & Waterman, 2004), and images (Ciardha & Gormley, 2012); men with a history of perpetrating domestic violence have a bias toward aggressive words (Chan, Raine, & Lee, 2010), and teenage fire‐setters have an attentional bias toward fire‐related pictures (Gallagher‐Duffy, MacKay, Duffy, Sullivan‐Thomas, & Peterson‐Badali, 2009). Kimonis, Graham, and Cauffman (2018) demonstrated that attention to affective pictures among teenage boys with a history of violent crime was predicted by callous and unemotional or uncaring traits, which was moderated by the severity of aggression, a finding reported in previous studies (Kimonis, Frick, Fazekas, & Loney, 2006; Kimonis, Frick, Munoz, & Aucoin, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An attentional bias refers to an a priori tendency to focus selectively on threatening information and is often measured by use of the Emotional Stroop Task (EST). An attentional bias toward aggressive- or violence-related words has been associated with higher levels of aggressive behavior in student populations as well as offenders and FPOs (e.g., Brugman et al, 2014 ; Chan, Raine, & Lee, 2010 ; Domes, Mense, Vohs, & Habermeyer, 2013 ; Smith & Waterman, 2003 , 2004 ). Even though a few studies examined this bias by use of the Stroop Task in clinical populations, it is not often used in clinical settings in association with treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processes underlying various mental health disorders could thus be expected to increase interference, as has indeed been found in a wide range of literature. Aggression and violence are associated with slowing effects on emotional Stroop tasks involving threat-related stimuli ( Brugman et al, 2016 ; Chan, Raine, & Lee, 2010 ; Domes, Mense, Vohs, & Habermeyer, 2013 ). Individuals suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) also show increased interference to trauma-related stimuli ( Aupperle, Melrose, Stein, & Paulus, 2012 ), e.g., in combat veterans with PTSD after deployment in Iraq to combat-related words ( Ashley, Honzel, Larsen, Justus, & Swick, 2013 ) and in Vietnam veterans with PTSD to pictures related to Vietnam ( Chemtob et al, 1999 ).…”
Section: Table A1mentioning
confidence: 99%