The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using double-stranded DNA probes to promote specificity in target capture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slow displacement activity of this 15 base-long, mismatched target by P15 is attributed to the lack of a toehold region. While considerably lower than primary hybridization rates, these k d values are comparable in magnitude to values reported for related 44 and unrelated 43,55 sequences in DNAfunctionalized colloidal systems involving the exchange of one partner for a stronger partner strand. For comparable temperature and secondary target concentrations, however, the observed displacement rate constants in the current work are about 2 orders of magnitude higher than rate constants reported by Reynaldo for oligonucleotide solutions.…”
Section: ■ Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The slow displacement activity of this 15 base-long, mismatched target by P15 is attributed to the lack of a toehold region. While considerably lower than primary hybridization rates, these k d values are comparable in magnitude to values reported for related 44 and unrelated 43,55 sequences in DNAfunctionalized colloidal systems involving the exchange of one partner for a stronger partner strand. For comparable temperature and secondary target concentrations, however, the observed displacement rate constants in the current work are about 2 orders of magnitude higher than rate constants reported by Reynaldo for oligonucleotide solutions.…”
Section: ■ Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Therefore, screening for miRNA requires the use of methods with high sensitivity, such as quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), , microarrays, ,,, and Northern blotting. , These methods are ideal for cell lysates but not in situ cellular analysis. Current biosensors for in situ cellular analysis include: molecular beacons, dual molecular beacons, dual linear probes, intercalator biosensors, double-strand displacement biosensors, , NanoFlares, and molecular sentinels. , In general, these methods provide selectivity and high sensitivity but suffer from slow analysis, false positives, or a lack of high selectivity. A majority of oligonucleotide-based fluorescent biosensors demonstrate an increase of fluorescence intensity upon target binding by disrupting a quenching mechanism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5(a) later experimental studies were carried out by the Milam group using DNA-functionalized polystyrene microspheres and nanoparticles to facilitate visual inspection of individual colloidal particles in suspension using phase contrast and confocal microscopy techniques as well as to provide quantitative assessment of primary and competitive hybridization activity on colloidal surfaces using ow cytometry. 109,115,[117][118][119][120] Displacement scenarios have been adapted to gold nanoparticle suspensions to demonstrate mismatch discrimination based on analysis of the disassembly kinetics. 121 Other studies featuring metallic nanoparticles have demonstrated that more subtle structural changes could be induced by strand displacement.…”
Section: Strand Displacement Cues In Responsive Materials Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%