2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2012.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing protection against OP pesticides and nerve agents provided by wild-type HuPON1 purified from Trichoplusia ni larvae or induced via adenoviral infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, in the latter study, the increased PON1 afforded protection of cells against the toxicity of soman and sarin (Curtin et al, 2008). The recent report by Hodgins et al (2013) supports the point that the catalytic efficiency for hydrolysis of a specific OP must be sufficiently high to protect against exposure to that specific OP. However, it also has been argued (Valiyaveettil et al, 2012) that a moderate increase of PON1 (less than twofold) may perhaps be sufficient to provide some protection against some of the symptoms of OP exposures, as shown by the protection seen against sarin and soman in guinea pigs (Valiyaveettil et al, 2011a,b).…”
Section: Pon1 As a Therapeutic Agentmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, in the latter study, the increased PON1 afforded protection of cells against the toxicity of soman and sarin (Curtin et al, 2008). The recent report by Hodgins et al (2013) supports the point that the catalytic efficiency for hydrolysis of a specific OP must be sufficiently high to protect against exposure to that specific OP. However, it also has been argued (Valiyaveettil et al, 2012) that a moderate increase of PON1 (less than twofold) may perhaps be sufficient to provide some protection against some of the symptoms of OP exposures, as shown by the protection seen against sarin and soman in guinea pigs (Valiyaveettil et al, 2011a,b).…”
Section: Pon1 As a Therapeutic Agentmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Although there was only a modest increase in plasma PON1 activity, PON1 from both species significantly increased survival time and antagonized several effects of the nerve agents, including AChE inhibition in brain. In apparent contrast to these findings, a more detailed study by Hodgins et al (2013) reported that administration of wild-type human PON1 purified from T. ni larvae (Otto et al, 2010) or induced via adenoviral infection in mice protected against the toxicity of the OP insecticides diazoxon and chlorpyrifos oxon, but not of several nerve agents (tabun, soman, sarin, cyclosarin). Protective effects were essentially identical to those of the other study.…”
Section: Pon1 and The Toxicity Of Nerve Agentsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Wild-type PON1 hydrolyzes a range of OP pesticide compounds in vitro, including diazoxon, chlorpyrifos, and paraoxon. Although the enzyme offered in vivo protection against diazoxon and chlorpyrifos, it failed to provide protection against paraoxon (Stevens et al, 2008;Duysen et al, 2011;Hodgins et al, 2013). The failure of wild-type PON1 to offer protection against paraoxon is attributed to insufficient catalytic efficiency, which results in the OP compound escaping the blood stream before PON1 is able to reduce the level of exposure below a lethal dose (Li et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%