2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.09.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction and fixation capabilities of different plate designs for pubic symphysis disruption: A biomechanical comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…APC are further classified depending on the estimated extent of injury, ranging from mechanically stable APCI via horizontally unstable APCII to completely unstable APCIII disruptions. While, there is a wide consensus that APCII and III should be stabilized surgically, the extent of stabilization in all APC is still under discussion . As a commonly stated postulate, a pubic symphysis widening of more than 25 mm indicates instabilities of the anterior sacroiliac, sacrospinous, and sacrotuberous ligaments (APCII), and therefore requires surgical intervention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…APC are further classified depending on the estimated extent of injury, ranging from mechanically stable APCI via horizontally unstable APCII to completely unstable APCIII disruptions. While, there is a wide consensus that APCII and III should be stabilized surgically, the extent of stabilization in all APC is still under discussion . As a commonly stated postulate, a pubic symphysis widening of more than 25 mm indicates instabilities of the anterior sacroiliac, sacrospinous, and sacrotuberous ligaments (APCII), and therefore requires surgical intervention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 ). Although more stable results may be achieved using pre-bent 6-hole plates with options for dynamic compression and screw locking mechanisms, we chose a 4-hole symphyseal non-locking plate for our control group 56 . Finally, the unilateral load applied in our single leg stance model can result in vertical translation and compression of the pubic symphysis, but is unlikely to cause re-widening.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ein Unterschied zwischen den Platten konnte nicht nachgewiesen werden. Weiterhin sind die Kompressionskräfte eine Plattenosteosynthese mit dynamischer Kompression vorteilhaft, da sie eine straffe Vernarbung im Bereich der Symphyse begünstigen [ 20 ]. Auch wenn die Symphysenplatte im Vergleich zum Fixateur eine höhere Stabilität durch die frakturnähere Fixation aufweist [ 21 , 22 ], so können individuelle Risikofaktoren (Infektion, Adipositas, Demenz, M. Parkinson etc.)…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified