2020
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1700980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

22q11.2 Microduplications: Two Clinical Reports Compared with Similar Cases from the Literature

Abstract: We present two male subjects (6 and 14 years old) with mild dysmorphism, intellectual disability, and/or autism spectrum disorder with chromosome 22q11.2 microduplications of different sizes. We then compared the clinical and genetic findings with similar cases from the literature sharing the same 22q11.2 duplications. These rare duplications in our subjects were identified by high-resolution chromosomal microarray analysis and flanked by low copy repeats in the 22q11.2 region, specifically LCR22A, LCR22B, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The outcome was unexpected as tests for myodystrophy turned out to be negative, but simultaneously the diagnosis of DiGeorge syndrome was established. This is one of many cases of patients who were diagnosed in their teenage or adult years due to mild-ness and non-specificity of the symptoms [1][2][3][4]. According to the patient's past medical history, there were many signs and symptoms that could have led to an earlier testing, but they were mild and unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome was unexpected as tests for myodystrophy turned out to be negative, but simultaneously the diagnosis of DiGeorge syndrome was established. This is one of many cases of patients who were diagnosed in their teenage or adult years due to mild-ness and non-specificity of the symptoms [1][2][3][4]. According to the patient's past medical history, there were many signs and symptoms that could have led to an earlier testing, but they were mild and unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%