2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1026363906432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: /npsi/ctrl?lang=en http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/npsi/ctrl?lang=fr Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/npsi/jsp/nparc_cp.jsp?lang=en NRC Publications Archive Archives des publications du CNRCThis publication could be one of several versions: author's original, accepted manuscript or the publisher's version. / La version de cette publication peut être l'une des suivantes : la version prépubli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect on the calculated amorphous content of R 900® is to increase it substantially from ∼5.6% to approximately 14%. Previous publications where the old amorphous content of SRM676 was used (Whitfield and Mitchell, 2003; Winburn et al , 2000) consequently
Figure 4.Phase fractions ( wt %) against time for data collected in transmission.
Figure 5.Portlandite phase fractions ( wt %) against time for data collected in both transmission and reflection. The corresponding textural index values are also shown on a second Y axis.
underestimate the amorphous content.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effect on the calculated amorphous content of R 900® is to increase it substantially from ∼5.6% to approximately 14%. Previous publications where the old amorphous content of SRM676 was used (Whitfield and Mitchell, 2003; Winburn et al , 2000) consequently
Figure 4.Phase fractions ( wt %) against time for data collected in transmission.
Figure 5.Portlandite phase fractions ( wt %) against time for data collected in both transmission and reflection. The corresponding textural index values are also shown on a second Y axis.
underestimate the amorphous content.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Rietveld analysis also affords the opportunity to quantify the presence of amorphous materials, both within unhydrated and hydrated cements (Suherman et al , 2002; Whitfield and Mitchell, 2003). This is achieved by the addition of a known amount of a crystalline internal standard material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sample holders were filled using the front-loading procedure. The data obtained from XRD were interpreted using Bruker-DIFFRAC.EVA software and a Rietveld analysis [30,31] in order to quantify the amorphous and crystalline percentage. The fly ash surface area was determined using Brunauer Emmett Teller method by N 2 absorption [32,33].…”
Section: Materials Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Le Saoût et al (2007) also noted that it is imperative to take into consideration the influence of refinement parameters on the quantification of amorphous contents. More research concerning the amorphous level of cements and clinkers was carried out by Whitfield and Mitchell (2003). They employed the internal standard method and calculated an amorphous content in the cement used of 18 to 25 wt %.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%