2016
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw582.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

221PD Efficacy and safety of nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI, MM-398, PEP02, BAX-2398) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer in Asia: A subgroup analysis of the phase 3 NAPOLI-1 Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a post hoc analysis of NAPOLI-1 showed Asian patients with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV had a 54.5% of grade 3-4 neutropenia as compared to the 17.8% in Caucasian patients 24,26 . Considering the higher incidence of hematological toxicities and thus more dose modification in the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV treated Asian population of NAPOLI-1 study [24][25][26][27] , our physicians chose to give lower starting doses of nal-IRI at 60 mg/m 2 in some patients with poor physical performance and/or poor nutrition status. This is reflected by the fact that patients in the reduced dose group were more of ECOG PS > 2, 34.5% versus 13.3%, and had lower baseline median albumin level, 3.4 g/dl versus 4.1 g/dl, as compared to those in the standard dose group.…”
Section: Treatment Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a post hoc analysis of NAPOLI-1 showed Asian patients with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV had a 54.5% of grade 3-4 neutropenia as compared to the 17.8% in Caucasian patients 24,26 . Considering the higher incidence of hematological toxicities and thus more dose modification in the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV treated Asian population of NAPOLI-1 study [24][25][26][27] , our physicians chose to give lower starting doses of nal-IRI at 60 mg/m 2 in some patients with poor physical performance and/or poor nutrition status. This is reflected by the fact that patients in the reduced dose group were more of ECOG PS > 2, 34.5% versus 13.3%, and had lower baseline median albumin level, 3.4 g/dl versus 4.1 g/dl, as compared to those in the standard dose group.…”
Section: Treatment Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A notable exception was a higher rate of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia in Asian compared with Caucasian patients (55% vs. 18%; n = 33 and 73); neutropenic fever/neutropenic sepsis occurred in 6% and 1% of Asian and Caucasian patients, respectively [ 17 , 18 ]. This notwithstanding, the safety profile of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV in the Asian cohort of NAPOLI-1 was manageable (abstract [ 44 ]). Indeed, Asian patients had a lower incidence of grade ≥ 3 diarrhoea compared with Caucasian patients (3% vs. 19%) [ 17 , 43 ].…”
Section: Tolerability Of Liposomal Irinotecanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, this multicentre, retrospective, observational study demonstrated that the effectiveness and safety of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV in clinical practice was similar to that observed in NAPOLI-1, particularly to the results observed in Asian patients who were enrolled in that study. 13,15 The results presented here show that nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV was an effective and feasible therapy in patients with mPAC after failure of gemcitabine-based therapy in a real-world clinical setting. nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV is a clinically relevant and valuable addition to the arsenal of treatments for mPAC, characterised by a high unmet need, exemplified by limited survival and lack of treatment options.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…These findings were consistent with the results of the NAPOLI-1 study and previous retrospective analyses, 13,14 particularly with the Asian subgroup analysis. 15 In the NAPOLI-1 study, the median OS and PFS were 6.1 and 3.1 months, respectively, and the ORR was 16% in the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV group. 13 In a recent retrospective analysis of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV, the median OS and PFS were 5.3 and 2.9 months, respectively, and the ORR was 5%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation