1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00665-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

22-Mb integrated physical and genetic map based on YAC/STS content spanning the interval DXS1125–DXS95 in human Xq12–q21.31

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both loci are found within a single YAC, suggesting that they might be less than 1 Mb apart. 38 Two of the previous XIST-containing ring X chromosomes failing to express XIST also had breakpoints within 1 Mb of XIST. The XIST gene is apparently intact in our patient, as a polymorphism was identified in the promoter that is telomeric to the 3' end of the gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both loci are found within a single YAC, suggesting that they might be less than 1 Mb apart. 38 Two of the previous XIST-containing ring X chromosomes failing to express XIST also had breakpoints within 1 Mb of XIST. The XIST gene is apparently intact in our patient, as a polymorphism was identified in the promoter that is telomeric to the 3' end of the gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the autosomal regions, the initial dinucleotide marker was chosen as near to the disease locus as possible, and the other loci studied were selected over gradually increasing distances ( Figure 2). The two X-chromosomal regions differ in the density of the markers studied; on Xq13, 8 microsatellites map to a region of < 4 cM, 25 whereas on Xp22, 7 markers are located with 15 cM (Figure 2). …”
Section: Microsatellite Typingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons of genetic and physical maps for the published contigs in Xp22. 3-p21.3 (Ferrero et al, 1995) Xp21.3-p11.3 (Nagaraja et al, submitted for publication), Xq12-q21.31 (Mumm et al, 1998) and Xq26.1-qter [summarized in Nagaraja et al, (1997)] have shown that there is good agreement between the physical and genetic order of CA repeats and the genetic map Therefore, it is reasonable to order and orient the 6 contigs based on their CA repeat content, as schematized in Fig. 2A.…”
Section: Contig Order and Comparison With Genetic And Radiation Hybrimentioning
confidence: 99%