217 A randomised, concentration-controlled, comparison of standard (5 day) vs prolonged (15 day) infusions of etoposide phosphate in small cell lung cancer (SCLC)
“…The particular finding of concentrationdependent myelotoxicity of etoposide was similar to that in another report. 19 In that study, 15 patients with previously untreated, extensive disease SCLC received single-agent etoposide phosphate by continuous infusion for 15 days. Dosage was based on targeting plasma etoposide concentration to 1 µg/ml.…”
Based on these findings, we propose a pharmacodynamic construct that uses measurements of both pharmacokinetic (ECpss, Clsys) and pharmacodynamic (hematologic toxicity, tumor response) parameters for patients with etoposide-sensitive tumors. Therapeutic drug monitoring may be able to mitigate hematologic toxicity.
“…The particular finding of concentrationdependent myelotoxicity of etoposide was similar to that in another report. 19 In that study, 15 patients with previously untreated, extensive disease SCLC received single-agent etoposide phosphate by continuous infusion for 15 days. Dosage was based on targeting plasma etoposide concentration to 1 µg/ml.…”
Based on these findings, we propose a pharmacodynamic construct that uses measurements of both pharmacokinetic (ECpss, Clsys) and pharmacodynamic (hematologic toxicity, tumor response) parameters for patients with etoposide-sensitive tumors. Therapeutic drug monitoring may be able to mitigate hematologic toxicity.
“…However, when treatment duration was extended to 8 days, no additional benefit was seen compared with 5 days, 1 and a 15-day infusion study had to be stopped early because of a worse response in the 15-day arm. 11 Thompson et al performed a study using a protracted intravenous infusion of etoposide. This study, carried out in patients with potentially etoposide-sensitive malignancies, was performed at doses of 18-25 mg mday -1 for 21-153 days.…”
Purpose. The study was performed to assess the antitumour activity and toxicity of a 72-h continuous infusion of single-agent etoposide as second-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS), following reports of substantial activity using this schedule of etoposide administration as first-line treatment in combination with ifosfamide.Patients/method. This was an open phase I/II trial performed at a single institution in patients with metastatic or locally advanced STS who had failed first-line treatment with doxorubicin + ifosfamide combination chemotherapy or, less commonly, single-agent treatment with doxorubicin or ifosfamide. Etoposide was given as a continuous intravenous infusion over 72 h. The starting dose level was 200 mg m(-2) day(-1) x 3 escalating in 10% steps in cohorts of three patients until dose-limiting toxicity was encountered.Results. Seventeen patients were treated, median age 47 years (range 26-71 years). No responses were seen in 16 assessable patients despite etoposide levels in the cotoxic range. The steady-state plasma concentration exceeded 8 mug ml-(1) in all patients and in patients treated at >/= 600 mg m -(2) the mean steady-state level was 14.4 mug ml -(1). The median event-free survival was 6 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.31-8.69) and the overall survival 16 weeks (95% CI 9.28-22.72). The maximum tolerated dose in this pretreated patient group was 200 mg mm(-2) day(-1) x 3. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression.Discussion. Etoposide given by 72-h infusion is inactive as second-line chemotherapy in STS. It is associated with significant toxicity when given in these doses, in this patient group.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.