The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(97)89599-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

217 A randomised, concentration-controlled, comparison of standard (5 day) vs prolonged (15 day) infusions of etoposide phosphate in small cell lung cancer (SCLC)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The particular finding of concentrationdependent myelotoxicity of etoposide was similar to that in another report. 19 In that study, 15 patients with previously untreated, extensive disease SCLC received single-agent etoposide phosphate by continuous infusion for 15 days. Dosage was based on targeting plasma etoposide concentration to 1 µg/ml.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particular finding of concentrationdependent myelotoxicity of etoposide was similar to that in another report. 19 In that study, 15 patients with previously untreated, extensive disease SCLC received single-agent etoposide phosphate by continuous infusion for 15 days. Dosage was based on targeting plasma etoposide concentration to 1 µg/ml.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when treatment duration was extended to 8 days, no additional benefit was seen compared with 5 days, 1 and a 15-day infusion study had to be stopped early because of a worse response in the 15-day arm. 11 Thompson et al performed a study using a protracted intravenous infusion of etoposide. This study, carried out in patients with potentially etoposide-sensitive malignancies, was performed at doses of 18-25 mg mday -1 for 21-153 days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%