1978
DOI: 10.1080/00405007808631438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

21—the Design and Dynamics of Non-Linear Cams for Use in High-Speed Weft-Knitting Machines Part Iii: The Analysis of Knitting-Yarn Tensions With Non-Linear Cams and Positive Feed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relation between the magnitude of RB and other relevant variables must be affected by the dynamic nature of knitting zone geometry in a manner different from that if the geometry were just static. In the course of this paper, we have subjected this aspect to a preliminary analysis.Various authors have suggested models for working out yam tension in the knitting zone as well as robbing back [ 1,5,7,9,13 ], but they have invariably ignored the effect of loops cast off in the cycle prior to the one under consideration. We designed the simple experiments described here with a view to establishing whether the assumption that the cast-off loop has an insignificant effect on RB is valid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relation between the magnitude of RB and other relevant variables must be affected by the dynamic nature of knitting zone geometry in a manner different from that if the geometry were just static. In the course of this paper, we have subjected this aspect to a preliminary analysis.Various authors have suggested models for working out yam tension in the knitting zone as well as robbing back [ 1,5,7,9,13 ], but they have invariably ignored the effect of loops cast off in the cycle prior to the one under consideration. We designed the simple experiments described here with a view to establishing whether the assumption that the cast-off loop has an insignificant effect on RB is valid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knitting cam setting seems to have a marginal effect [ 6 ] , whereas the extent to which fabric take-down tension affects RB is governed by the geometry of the knitting zone [ 4,12,13 ] . This geometry, a function of coordinates of needle hooks and sinkers, has generally been viewed in a static frame [1,5,8,9,13,14], but it is apparent that as a needle slides down the wall of a stitch cam, the geometry assumes a dynamic character. The relation between the magnitude of RB and other relevant variables must be affected by the dynamic nature of knitting zone geometry in a manner different from that if the geometry were just static.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%