2021
DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2020 APHRS/HRS expert consensus statement on the investigation of decedents with sudden unexplained death and patients with sudden cardiac arrest, and of their families

Abstract: This international multidisciplinary document intends to provide clinicians with evidence‐based practical patient‐centered recommendations for evaluating patients and decedents with (aborted) sudden cardiac arrest and their families. The document includes a framework for the investigation of the family allowing steps to be taken, should an inherited condition be found, to minimize further events in affected relatives. Integral to the process is counseling of the patients and families, not only because of the e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 369 publications
(714 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the relatively small number of clinically actionable gene variants, our findings are consistent with current guidelines 47 which support the use of genetic testing in young SCA victims. Cascade genetic testing facilitates recognition of family members that are at an increased risk of SCD and may therefore benefit from preventive interventions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Despite the relatively small number of clinically actionable gene variants, our findings are consistent with current guidelines 47 which support the use of genetic testing in young SCA victims. Cascade genetic testing facilitates recognition of family members that are at an increased risk of SCD and may therefore benefit from preventive interventions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Despite the clear recommendation to screen FDRs of SUD victims, we found that only 9.4% were screened in the current study [ 12 ]. The fact that 40% of SUD-FDR families have more than one SUD case highlight the lost opportunity of potentially preventing subsequent cases had a proper evaluation been performed after the first SUD case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Clinical assessment of family members should be also performed, including physical examination, ECGs, cardiac imaging, ambulatory monitoring, and provocative testing with multidisciplinary team supervision. Follow-up and periodic re-evaluation are important and are directed by initial findings 47 .…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%