2019 global review of constitutional law: Georgia

Nakashidze, Malkhaz

doi:10.1093/icon/moaa035

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These appointments were made without the participation of the opposition and in the wake of protests by civil society organizations. In fact, the ruling party completed the selection of judges for the Supreme Court of Georgia in a one-party manner, which can be described as an attempt to influence the court (Nakashidze, 2020). The EU report also noted that the recent selection procedure of Supreme Court judges was not entirely in line with these recommendations and was marred by serious shortcomings, emphasizing the importance of a depoliticised judiciary free from political interference and of respect for transparency, meritocracy, and accountability in the appointment of judges to the Supreme Court of Georgia and other judicial institutions.…”

Section: Domestic Political Reforms and Democratic Development In Georgiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

Nakashidze¹

2021

ICJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The European Union has an Association Agreement with Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine. One of the important commitments of this document is to bring the rule of law, democracy, and human rights systems closer to European standards. This article discusses the reforms carried out in the above mentioned Eastern Partnership countries in the field of rule of law and the developments, achievements, and current challenges of democratic institutions. It also analyzes the role of the European Union and the legal significance of the Association Agreement in ensuring progress towards the rule of law and democratic transformation.

show abstract

Section: Domestic Political Reforms and Democratic Development In Georgiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

Nakashidze¹

2021

ICJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Law and State Practice in Georgia: Dealing with the Issues Concerning the Search, Exhumation and Identification of Missing Persons in Conflict Zones

Sarkin

2022

Cauc. Surv.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article deals with the issues associated with missing persons in Georgia, which are deeply interrelated with the conflicts over the disputed territories of Abkhazia since 1992 and South Ossetia from 1991. The article examines the historical, democratic, and human rights context of these issues in Georgia to understand the situation in the country and its effects on how the missing are dealt with. The article deals with the various processes that are working on the missing. The legislation concerning missing persons in Georgia is reviewed and found to be scattered, incomplete and in need of reform. The article also recommends that Georgia allocate more resources to its efforts and better assist the families of the missing. It is also recommended that a Families’ Needs Assessment be carried out and that an Office of Missing Persons be established.

show abstract

2019 global review of constitutional law: Georgia

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Untitled

Untitled

Law and State Practice in Georgia: Dealing with the Issues Concerning the Search, Exhumation and Identification of Missing Persons in Conflict Zones

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About