2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2017 ACR Annual Meeting Open-Microphone Session: Navigating the Landscape of Changing Practice Models: Private Practice, Corporate Radiology, and Enterprise Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to the pandemic, radiologists saw these entities as having access to capital markets, expertise in consolidation, and stability in a tumultuous radiology market. (15,16) Investors in these private equity firms and/or publicly traded companies own a portion of the practice. These firms re-invest to develop business infrastructure and growth, and in turn receive a portion of profits generated by physician professional activity.…”
Section: Factors Determining the Pandemic Impact On Private Radiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the pandemic, radiologists saw these entities as having access to capital markets, expertise in consolidation, and stability in a tumultuous radiology market. (15,16) Investors in these private equity firms and/or publicly traded companies own a portion of the practice. These firms re-invest to develop business infrastructure and growth, and in turn receive a portion of profits generated by physician professional activity.…”
Section: Factors Determining the Pandemic Impact On Private Radiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although referred patients generally arrive with outside imaging studies and interpretations, numerous studies showed that second-opinion subspecialty radiology consultations are clinically valuable and often lead to changes in patient management. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] In fact, discrepancy rates were found to be as high as 26% between radiologists with different levels of specialty training including those trained in MSK imaging. [20][21][22] Although we believe this phenomenon to be true throughout the MSK imaging arena, we have shown the value of subspecialty MSK imaging expertise in the orthopaedic oncology arena.…”
Section: Add Value and Show Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly in oncology patients, the complexity of cases often requires conversations with multiple specialists because important clinical details may not be available in indications or EMRs. 3,4 For example, at our institution all patients have second-opinion interpretations performed by fellowship-trained MSK radiologists, after review with MSK radiology fellows and the orthopaedic oncology clinical team at a weekly multidisciplinary conference. The MSK attending radiologists, MSK radiology fellows, and the orthopaedic oncology team review all relevant imaging studies and discuss diagnostic considerations and treatment options.…”
Section: Add Value and Show Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations