2015 Department of Defense Health Related Behaviors Survey (HRBS)

Abstract

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest.RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1695Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2018 RAND CorporationR® is a registered trademark. Cover photo credits from top to bottom:Photo by Cpl PrefaceThe Health Related Behaviors Survey (HRBS) is the U.S. Department of Defense's flagship survey for understanding the health, health-related behaviors, and well-being of service members. Originally implemented to assess substance use (i.e., illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco), the survey now includes content areas-such as mental and physical health, sexual behavior, and postdeployment problems-that may affect force readiness or the ability to meet the demands of military life. The HRBS is intended to supplement administrative data already collected by the armed forces. In 2014, the Defense Health Agency asked the RAND Corporation to review previous iterations of the HRBS, update survey content, administer a revised version of the survey, and analyze data from the resulting 2015 HRBS of active-duty personnel. The 2015 HRBS included U.S. Air Force, Army, Marine Corps, Navy, and Coast Guard personnel, and this report details the survey methodology and results. No expertise in health, health-related behaviors, or health care is required to read this report. However, it may be of most use to individuals who provide direct care related to the health and health-related behaviors of active-duty service members or who are responsible for making related policy decisions. Additional information can be found in a series of online appendixes.This research was sponsored by the Defense Health Agency and conducted within the Forces and Resources Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelli...

A Descriptive Study of Transgender Active Duty Service Members in the U.S. Military

“…Extant studies of transgender service members typically do not include subgroup analyses by affirmed gender; 3,8 the current study, in contrast, included exploratory analyses to examine differences by gender identity. The physical health of transfemales exceeded that of transmales in the current study.…”

“…In 2019, the Department of Defense issued a policy stipulating that, with limited exceptions, transgender individuals are ineligible for accession and retention in the U.S. Military unless they serve in their biological sex. 1 It is estimated, however, that up to 8000 transgender individuals currently serve on active duty in the U.S. military 2,3 ; although the actual number may be greater 4,5 due to insufficient study of this population and potential fear of disclosure of one's gender identity, which may reduce willingness to seek gender-affirming care or self-identify as transgender in surveys. Notably, transgender persons appear twice as likely as members of the general population to serve in the military; 20% of respondents from the National Transgender Discrimination Survey had served in the military, compared to 10% of the general population.…”

Counseling Military Populations: A Content Analysis of Counseling Journals From 1998 to 2018

“…Across all mental health military scholarship, including counseling, researchers have noted stigma with respect to obtaining services. Psychiatry and psychology researchers have noted high dropout rates (Kehle-Forbes et al, 2016) and perceived barriers to seeking treatment (Meadows et al, 2018) among military clients. However, in the counseling literature, there lacks empirical representation to describe how clients are engaged and the prevalence rates of military clients receiving counseling services.…”

“…As the clinical needs and environmental systems of military populations became more public and help-seeking behaviors increased (Meadows et al, 2018), so did the counseling profession's awareness to provide mental health services. National organizations such as the American Counseling Association (ACA) and the National Board for Certified Counselors successfully advocated for counselors to be providers through military insurance (TRICARE) in the Federal Register .…”

Cost‐Effectiveness of a Weight Loss Intervention: An Adaptation of the Look AHEAD Lifestyle Intervention in the US Military

“…BMI, an individual’s weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared, can be used to categorize individuals into weight categories. Approximately 51.0% of active‐duty service members are classified as having overweight (BMI 25 to 29.9) compared with 31.6% of the general US adult population, and 14.7% are classified as having obesity (BMI ≥ 30) compared with 39.6% of the US population . Excess weight and inadequate fitness among active‐duty personnel are associated with higher risk of incident lower extremity musculoskeletal injury/disorder and higher absenteeism rates as well as substantial costs for the DoD, including increased medical care and the cost of recruiting and training replacements for individuals discharged because of fitness test failure .…”