2014
DOI: 10.4155/bio.14.279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2014 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: A Full Immersion in Bioanalysis (Part 2 – Hybrid LBA/LCMS, ELN & Regulatory Agencies’ Input)

Abstract: The 2014 8th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (8th WRIB), a 5-day full immersion in the evolving field of bioanalysis, took place in Universal City, California, USA. Close to 500 professionals from pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies, contract research organizations and regulatory agencies worldwide convened to share, review, discuss and agree on approaches to address current issues of interest in bioanalysis. The topics covered included both small and large molecules, and involved LCMS, hyb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2014, it was recommended that for successful design and implementation of ELNs, consideration should be given on how the ELN will be integrated with instruments, LIMS and other databases in the laboratory, how it will be reviewed by supervisors and QA, how interim and regulatory reports will be prepared, how archiving will be managed and how the regulators can inspect the data via the ELN. Close collaboration with IT specialists was considered crucial [9]. In 2016, prior recommendations regarding the use of ELN were still considered valid.…”
Section: Electronic Laboratory Notebooks and Reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In 2014, it was recommended that for successful design and implementation of ELNs, consideration should be given on how the ELN will be integrated with instruments, LIMS and other databases in the laboratory, how it will be reviewed by supervisors and QA, how interim and regulatory reports will be prepared, how archiving will be managed and how the regulators can inspect the data via the ELN. Close collaboration with IT specialists was considered crucial [9]. In 2016, prior recommendations regarding the use of ELN were still considered valid.…”
Section: Electronic Laboratory Notebooks and Reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was not generally recommended to measure an analyte with both approaches; however, this may happen when one assay or technology runs into issues such as matrix interference, when early data are generated on one platform and then the platform is switched to the other; or when the molecular complexity necessitates additional characterization. When cross-validating between LCMS and LBA, QC samples and incurred samples should be used, and the general acceptance criteria that should be applied are twothirds of sample results within 30% [9]. The following year, this recommendation was expanded to conclude that if cross-validation of LBA and LCMS data are required, then it is recommended to use the same capture reagent [12].…”
Section: Cross-validating (Lba and Lcms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations