2011
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2010 i2b2/VA challenge on concepts, assertions, and relations in clinical text

Abstract: The 2010 i2b2/VA Workshop on Natural Language Processing Challenges for Clinical Records presented three tasks: a concept extraction task focused on the extraction of medical concepts from patient reports; an assertion classification task focused on assigning assertion types for medical problem concepts; and a relation classification task focused on assigning relation types that hold between medical problems, tests, and treatments. i2b2 and the VA provided an annotated reference standard corpus for the three t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
758
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 910 publications
(817 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
758
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Research challenges have also fuelled the annotation of resources or enrichment of available texts. Well-known corpora come from the i2b2 challenges (Uzuner et al 2010(Uzuner et al , 2011Sun et al 2013), SemEval (Bethard et al 2016) and the Shared Annotated Resources (ShARe)/CLEF eHealth labs. 8 Overall, two levels of annotations have been applied in clinical texts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research challenges have also fuelled the annotation of resources or enrichment of available texts. Well-known corpora come from the i2b2 challenges (Uzuner et al 2010(Uzuner et al , 2011Sun et al 2013), SemEval (Bethard et al 2016) and the Shared Annotated Resources (ShARe)/CLEF eHealth labs. 8 Overall, two levels of annotations have been applied in clinical texts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, corpora of clinical text drawn from EHRs are rare, due to privacy and confidentiality concerns, but also because of the time-consuming, expensive and tedious nature of producing high quality annotations, which are reliant on the expertise of domain experts (Uzuner et al, 2011). A small number of corpora, however, have been made available, mainly in the context of shared task challenges, which aim to encourage the development of information extraction (IE) systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most information extraction efforts focused on phenotyping and chart abstraction improvement [125], research subjects recruitment and cohort identification for retrospective studies, and patient identification for improved treatment and follow-up. The extraction of phenotypes and other types of information include diseases and problems, investigations, treatments, combined in the 4th i2b2 NLP challenge [126], or medication details for example [127]. Various data and attribute values were extracted to support peripheral artery disease and heart failure research in the eMERGE network [128], and to support obesity research [129].…”
Section: F Extraction Of Information From Unstructured Clinical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%