2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1014372101550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2001 INVITED ADDRESS: The Mystery of Human Context and Coping: An Unraveling of Clues

Abstract: Community and clinical psychology share a fundamental focus: to understand the interplay between human contexts, coping, and adaptation. To highlight recent progress in this area, I offer a guiding conceptual framework and discuss 8 propositions about environment and coping. The propositions consider such issues as patterns of social climate and coping and their links to personal development and dysfunction, the connections between ongoing life circumstances and intervention programs, the role of personal char… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
128
0
13

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
5
128
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…(Hiemstra, 1991, p. 8) In this article, we separate from socio-psychological characteristics of learning environment as defined by Moos (2002) and focus to the psychosocial nature of this concept, which incorporates participants' views of the course, educational program, and the connections among the participants and teachers. Moos defines the psychosocial environment as having three dimensions that indicate our everyday behaviour and experiences: (1) the relationship dimension, (2) the personal growth dimension, and (3) the dimension of the system's characteristics.…”
Section: Defining Learning Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Hiemstra, 1991, p. 8) In this article, we separate from socio-psychological characteristics of learning environment as defined by Moos (2002) and focus to the psychosocial nature of this concept, which incorporates participants' views of the course, educational program, and the connections among the participants and teachers. Moos defines the psychosocial environment as having three dimensions that indicate our everyday behaviour and experiences: (1) the relationship dimension, (2) the personal growth dimension, and (3) the dimension of the system's characteristics.…”
Section: Defining Learning Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stress and coping theory suggests that adaptational outcomes including alcohol and drug use and problems, are influenced by stressors, social support, and coping strategies Finney and Moos, 1984), as well as interventions (Moos, 2002). The model suggests that substance use and problems are influenced by chronic, ongoing "life" stressors (e.g., health stress), social resources (e.g., supportive friendships), and the "personal system", which includes demographic characteristics (e.g., age, gender, and education) and CD interventions (Moos, 2002); and generally posits that stressors are related to worse outcomes.…”
Section: Stress and Coping Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model suggests that substance use and problems are influenced by chronic, ongoing "life" stressors (e.g., health stress), social resources (e.g., supportive friendships), and the "personal system", which includes demographic characteristics (e.g., age, gender, and education) and CD interventions (Moos, 2002); and generally posits that stressors are related to worse outcomes. However, stressors could also have the opposite effect, deterring use if they are a consequence of or "contingent to" drinking behavior .…”
Section: Stress and Coping Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is based in part on a general framework of the determinants of functioning and well-being in human development (Moos, 2002), but is tailored specifically to the circumstances of schizophrenia.…”
Section: A New Integrative Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%