1995
DOI: 10.1016/0076-6879(95)58052-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[20] Use of rapid kinetics methods to study the assembly of the diferric-tyrosyl radical cofactor of E. coli ribonucleotide reductase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
103
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because most known di-iron enzymes are catalytically active in a reduced (diferrous) form (12, 13), we first used chemical reductants to prepare diferrous AurF for singleturnover experiments. Based on the protocols of similar experiments developed for the hydroxylase subunit of the soluble methane monooxygenase (MMOH) (14,15), we used either sodium dithionite or ascorbate as a chemical reductant and various chemicals, including phenazine methosulfate (PMS), methyl viologen, and proflavin as an electron mediator. It was found that the in vitro enzymatic activity of AurF was best reconstituted in the presence of PMS and ascorbate [supporting information (SI) Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because most known di-iron enzymes are catalytically active in a reduced (diferrous) form (12, 13), we first used chemical reductants to prepare diferrous AurF for singleturnover experiments. Based on the protocols of similar experiments developed for the hydroxylase subunit of the soluble methane monooxygenase (MMOH) (14,15), we used either sodium dithionite or ascorbate as a chemical reductant and various chemicals, including phenazine methosulfate (PMS), methyl viologen, and proflavin as an electron mediator. It was found that the in vitro enzymatic activity of AurF was best reconstituted in the presence of PMS and ascorbate [supporting information (SI) Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acquisition parameters were as described previously (19,43,48) at 9.4 GHz, 2 milliwatt power, 2.52 ϫ 10 3 gain, 1.5 G modulation amplitude, and 100 kHz modulation frequency. Spin quantitation was performed by double integration of the signal and comparison with an E. coli NrdB sample in which the Tyr ⅐ content had been determined by the drop line method using UV-visible spectroscopy (49). Analysis was carried out using WinEPR software (Brüker).…”
Section: Whole-cell Epr Spectroscopy Of Galrnr4 Cells and Epr Spectromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Y• of E. coli R2 (2.5-115 µM) was used to generate a standard curve. The concentration of Y• in the E. coli standard was determined by the drop-line correction method (19), and the protein concentration was determined using the known ε 280 of 131 mM −1 cm −1 . For determination of the Y• concentration in vivo, the EPR spectrum of yeast cells treated with hydroxyurea (150 mM, 1 h) was subtracted from that of untreated cells to subtract contributions from species other than the Y• of RNR as described (20).…”
Section: In Vivo Concentration Of Y• By Whole-cell Epr Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%