Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(97)00201-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

20 MHz ultrasonic imaging for quantitative assessment and documentation of early and late postradiation skin reactions in breast cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
47
2
Order By: Relevance
“…8 -20 Other than observer scoring of radiation skin changes by visual inspection, methods of evaluating acute skin toxicity include spectrophotometry, 21 reflectance spectroscopy with computerized color analyzer, 22 and ultrasonic imaging. 23 Although these techniques may provide objective measures of skin reaction, their implementation in a busy clinic is cumbersome and time consuming. Another limitation of the available skin assessment instruments is that they often emphasize observer evaluation of skin reactions but do not address associated patient symptoms and functional outcomes even though this information may impact management decisions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 -20 Other than observer scoring of radiation skin changes by visual inspection, methods of evaluating acute skin toxicity include spectrophotometry, 21 reflectance spectroscopy with computerized color analyzer, 22 and ultrasonic imaging. 23 Although these techniques may provide objective measures of skin reaction, their implementation in a busy clinic is cumbersome and time consuming. Another limitation of the available skin assessment instruments is that they often emphasize observer evaluation of skin reactions but do not address associated patient symptoms and functional outcomes even though this information may impact management decisions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cutaneous ultrasonography has been extensively used in human dermatology to study normal skin echogenicity, thickness and hydration status, as well as various pathologic conditions, including cutaneous or subcutaneous neoplasms, cysts, inflammatory lesions, post-radiation reactions, scleroderma, edema, wounds, and presence of foreign bodies (Alexander and Miller 1979;Miyauchi and Miki 1983;Fornage and Deshayes 1986;Fornage et al 1993;Fornage 1993;Gniadecka 1996;Gniadecka and Quistorff 1996;Warszawski et al 1997;Milner et al 1997;Cammarota et al 1998;Foster et al 2000;Eisenbeiss et al 2001;Mirpuri et al 2001;Dyson et al 2003;Scope and Halpern 2003;Kong et al 2008). Contrary to the situation in human medicine, in veterinary medicine only few studies on cutaneous ultrasonography of the canine skin are available (Diana et al 2004;Mantis et al 2005;Mantis et al 2007;Diana et al 2008;Zanna et al 2012;Mantis et al 2014).…”
Section: The Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These imaging modalities are especially helpful if there is a concern that the LE is related to cancer diagnosis [6]. Ultrasonic skin thickness measurement can be used for monitoring LE [21][22][23][24][25]. Ultrasound scans, particularly high-resolution Doppler, can help to differentiate LE from lipedema and may also be helpful in the detection of LE of the head and neck.…”
Section: Soft Tissue Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%