2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2012.04743
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2-Step Sparse-View CT Reconstruction with a Domain-Specific Perceptual Network

Haoyu Wei,
Florian Schiffers,
Tobias Würfl
et al.

Abstract: Computed tomography is widely used to examine internal structures in a non-destructive manner. To obtain high-quality reconstructions, one typically has to acquire a densely sampled trajectory to avoid angular undersampling. However, many scenarios require a sparse-view measurement leading to streak-artifacts if unaccounted for. Current methods do not make full use of the domain-specific information, and hence fail to provide reliable reconstructions for highly undersampled data.We present a novel framework fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare our method against [34], which we refer to as score-CT henceforth. We also compare with the best-in-class supervised learning methods, cGAN [12] and SIN-4c-PRN [41]. As a compressed sensing baseline, FISTA-TV [3] was included, along with the analytical reconstruction method, FBP.…”
Section: Datasets and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our method against [34], which we refer to as score-CT henceforth. We also compare with the best-in-class supervised learning methods, cGAN [12] and SIN-4c-PRN [41]. As a compressed sensing baseline, FISTA-TV [3] was included, along with the analytical reconstruction method, FBP.…”
Section: Datasets and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For MAR experiments, we include another learning-free baseline called linear interpolation (LI, Kalender et al, 1987). (Gilton et al, 2019), and SIN-4c-PRN (Wei et al, 2020) as supervised learning baselines. We follow the settings in Wei et al (2020) and train all methods with 23 projection angles.…”
Section: Standard Techniques In Medical Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Gilton et al, 2019), and SIN-4c-PRN (Wei et al, 2020) as supervised learning baselines. We follow the settings in Wei et al (2020) and train all methods with 23 projection angles. For MAR, we use cGANMAR and SNMAR (Yu et al, 2020) as the baselines.…”
Section: Standard Techniques In Medical Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations