2022
DOI: 10.1111/hepr.13745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2‐Step PLT16‐AST44 method: Simplified liver fibrosis detection system in patients with non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease

Abstract: Aim: Accurate detection of the hepatic fibrosis stage is essential to estimate the outcome of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Many formulas, biomarkers, and imaging tests are being developed to predict advanced liver fibrosis without performing a liver biopsy. However, these tests do not have high efficiency in detecting early-stage hepatic fibrosis. Therefore, we aimed to detect the presence of hepatic fibrosis (≥F1) merely by using only standard clinical markers.Methods: A total of 4… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study concentrated on the diagnostic ability of noninvasive tools to identify and differentiate significant and advanced fibrosis (F2+ and F3+), stipulating that the diagnosis made at this stage may impact clinical decision-making and change the course of the disease. Still, the efficiency of the tools in detecting earlier stages of fibrosis (F1+) has not been reviewed, while it may be increasingly important in the disease course, as treatment measures at earlier stages may positively impact the disease outcomes [ 59 ]. Additionally, some of the multicenter studies cited here did not have a centralized pathological reading, which then introduces substantial bias in relation to inter-pathologist variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study concentrated on the diagnostic ability of noninvasive tools to identify and differentiate significant and advanced fibrosis (F2+ and F3+), stipulating that the diagnosis made at this stage may impact clinical decision-making and change the course of the disease. Still, the efficiency of the tools in detecting earlier stages of fibrosis (F1+) has not been reviewed, while it may be increasingly important in the disease course, as treatment measures at earlier stages may positively impact the disease outcomes [ 59 ]. Additionally, some of the multicenter studies cited here did not have a centralized pathological reading, which then introduces substantial bias in relation to inter-pathologist variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method for measuring serum ATX was the same as previously reported 19 . FIB-4 index, Forn’s index, and APRI were calculated according to the following formulae: FIB-4 index = (age [years] × AST [IU/L])/(platelet count [10 9 /L] ×ALT [IU/L] 1/2 ) 25 , Forn’s index = 7.811 − (3.131 × ln platelet count [× 10 4 /uL]) + (0.781 × ln GGTP [U/L]) + (3.647 × ln age [years]) – (0.0114 × cholesterol [mg/dL]) 26 , and APRI = (AST/upper limit of normal; 28 [U/L]) × (100/platelet count [10 9 /L]) 27 . Serum TSP2 concentrations were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Quantikine® ELISA, #DTSP20, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liver specimens of at least 1.5 cm in length were obtained from segments 5 or 8 using a 14-gauge needle as described previously and immediately fixed in 10% neutral formalin 25 . Sections of 4 μm in thickness were cut and stained using the hematoxylin and eosin and Azan-Mallory methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All laboratory data and body composition measurements were obtained in a fasting state. Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet ratio index (APRI) were calculated according to the following formulas: FIB-4 = (age [years] × AST [U/L])/(platelet count (PLT) [×10 9 /L] × alanine aminotransferase (ALT) [U/L] 1/2 ) [ 17 ], and APRI = AST [U/L]/upper limit of the normal range [U/L]/PLT [10 9 /L] × 100 [ 18 , 19 ]. The interval between patient visits and blood sampling was 4 weeks, at which time the patient was also interviewed about side effects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%