2-C-Methyl-3,4-O-methylidene-D-arabinono-1,5-lactone

Abstract

Key indicatorsSingle-crystal X-ray study T = 150 K Mean (C-C) = 0.003 Å R factor = 0.038 wR factor = 0.079 Data-to-parameter ratio = 9.4For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see

2,4-Di-C-methyl-α-L-arabinose monohydrate

“…For background information, see: Mitchell et al (2007); Hotchkiss et al (2006Hotchkiss et al ( ,2007; Soengas et al (2005); Chapleur & Chré tien, (1997); Ho (1978). For related literature, see: Booth, Best et al (2007); Bream et al (2006); Gö rbitz (1999); Koos & Mosher (1986); Punzo et al (2005).…”

“…Branching of sugars can be achieved in several ways; the Kiliani reaction of ketoses with cyanide (Hotchkiss et al, 2006;Soengas et al, 2005); calcium oxide treatment of Amadori compounds (Hotchkiss et al, 2006(Hotchkiss et al, ,2007; the Aldol reaction for the introduction of hydroxymethyl branches (Ho, 1978;Koos & Mosher, 1986). Using these techniques, 2-Cmethyl arabinose derivatives have been reported (Bream et al, 2006;Punzo et al, 2005). Doubly branched sugar derivatives are rare; examples include 2,4-di-C-methyl-3,4-O-isopropylidene-L-arabinono-1,5-lactone and various protected forms of 3,5-di-C-methyl-mannono and glucono lactones (Booth et al, 2007a,b,c).…”