2012
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201204946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2′‐Fluoro RNA Shows Increased Watson–Crick H‐Bonding Strength and Stacking Relative to RNA: Evidence from NMR and Thermodynamic Data

Abstract: The way it is: Incorporation of 2′‐deoxy‐2′‐fluororibonucleotides (2′‐F RNA) into RNA oligomers leads to a marked increase in duplex stability. Using NMR spectroscopy (see picture) with native (red circles) and 2′‐F modified (black squares) RNA duplexes, and UV melting and osmotic stress experiments the higher stability of 2′‐F RNA relative to RNA is shown to be the result of both increased Watson–Crick H‐bonding strength and favorable base stacking.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possibility is that an electron-donating 2′-amino substituent may affect the nucleobase p K a values or sugar puckering in a way that further weakens A:T base pairing, whereas a 3′-amino substituent, being further from the glycosidic linkage, might not have this effect. 33,34 Another example of a nucleobase-specific effect is our observation that an r(T) 4 template is significantly better than an r(U) 4 template in directing the polymerization of activated 3′-amino A monomer. Presumably this improvement reflects stronger or altered stacking interactions that cause the r(T) 4 template to be more ordered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One possibility is that an electron-donating 2′-amino substituent may affect the nucleobase p K a values or sugar puckering in a way that further weakens A:T base pairing, whereas a 3′-amino substituent, being further from the glycosidic linkage, might not have this effect. 33,34 Another example of a nucleobase-specific effect is our observation that an r(T) 4 template is significantly better than an r(U) 4 template in directing the polymerization of activated 3′-amino A monomer. Presumably this improvement reflects stronger or altered stacking interactions that cause the r(T) 4 template to be more ordered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The 2 -deoxy-2 -fluororibonucleotide (2 -F-RNA) modification has been widely used to modify oligonucleotides for oligonucleotidebased therapeutics. Incorporation of a 2 -F-RNA residue stabilizes an A-form RNA duplex (Egli & Manoharan, 2019;Manoharan et al, 2011;Patra et al, 2012). Specifically, 2 -F ribo-substitution pre-organizes the sugar into a C3 -endo or North conformation and hence reduces the entropic penalty for the formation of the A-form duplex and increases base stacking and Watson-Crick hydrogen-bond stabilities due to its electronwithdrawing power (Patra et al, 2012).…”
Section: Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporation of a 2 -F-RNA residue stabilizes an A-form RNA duplex (Egli & Manoharan, 2019;Manoharan et al, 2011;Patra et al, 2012). Specifically, 2 -F ribo-substitution pre-organizes the sugar into a C3 -endo or North conformation and hence reduces the entropic penalty for the formation of the A-form duplex and increases base stacking and Watson-Crick hydrogen-bond stabilities due to its electronwithdrawing power (Patra et al, 2012). Furthermore, 2 -F-RNA-modified siRNAs have reduced immune stimulation and improved activity in vitro and in vivo compared to unmodified siRNAs and are in clinical development.…”
Section: Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also incorporated 2’-F-RNAs in this round of optimization since they can increase thermal and nuclease stability of RNA:RNA or RNA:DNA duplexes, and they also interfere minimally with C3’-endo sugar puckering. 21,22 2’-F may be better tolerated than 2’-OMe at positions where the 2’-OH is important for RNA:DNA duplex stability. For these reasons, we synthesized two crRNAs based on C9 but with 2’-F modifications at positions 11-14 and/or 17-18 ( C10-C11 ).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%