2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1008368330519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2-Fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D glucose positron emission tomography in the pretreatment staging of Hodgkin's disease: Influence on patient management in a single institution

Abstract: Significantly more sites of disease were identified by PET than CT resulting in stage changes and a modification of therapy in 25% of patients. This has important implications not only for current patient management but also for the design of future clinical trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
1
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
52
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies in HL patients have shown upstaging in 11-41% and downstaging in 0-28% usingFDG-PET. 13,14,19,20 In our series, 3 modifications (10%) in the treatment strategy according to FDG-PET results affected the extent of radiotherapy fields. A recent report indicates a change in therapeutic strategy in 9% of HL patients after considering the results of PET/CT.…”
Section: Impact Of Fdg Pet On Ann Arbor Staging and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Several studies in HL patients have shown upstaging in 11-41% and downstaging in 0-28% usingFDG-PET. 13,14,19,20 In our series, 3 modifications (10%) in the treatment strategy according to FDG-PET results affected the extent of radiotherapy fields. A recent report indicates a change in therapeutic strategy in 9% of HL patients after considering the results of PET/CT.…”
Section: Impact Of Fdg Pet On Ann Arbor Staging and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The meta-analysis by Pakos et al [1] summarising the results of 13 studies comprising a total of 587 patients showed that compared with BMB, the weighted sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET were 51% and 91%, respectively. In the sub-group analysis, BMB showed better sensitivity in HL (76%) and in aggressive NHL, while FDG-PET gave false negative results in two-thirds of patients with bone marrow involvement in more indolent histological forms of NHL, leading to the conclusion that the role of PET/CT would be complementary [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Fuster et al [34] investigated the role of FDG-PET vs bone marrow disease in detecting bone marrow disease in patients with HL and NHL and found out that FDG-PET was more sensitive than BMB in HL and NHL with the exception of Grade 1 and 2 follicular lymphomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these limitations, PET is clearly emerging to have a significant role in the diagnostic evaluation of lymphoma, particularly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease. Small studies also suggest that the initial management of patients with lymphoma in clinical practice frequently changes based upon PET scan findings [20,21]. A summary of selected published studies of diagnostic PET imaging is in Table 2.…”
Section: Role Of Pet In Diagnostic Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%