2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2009
DOI: 10.1109/robot.2009.5152334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2 DOF cartesian force limiting device for safe physical human-robot interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, ) and looks simpler than (6). However, formulating a Lyapunov function for (11) is actually much more challenging (e.g., the dissipative-energy condition used in (8) is not preserved here).…”
Section: Admittance Control In the The Robot Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, ) and looks simpler than (6). However, formulating a Lyapunov function for (11) is actually much more challenging (e.g., the dissipative-energy condition used in (8) is not preserved here).…”
Section: Admittance Control In the The Robot Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A technique that combines torque limiters with parallel mechanisms to create Cartesian force limiting devices (CFLD) was recently proposed in Lauzier et al (2009). The device behaves like a structure unless the external forces exceed a certain threshold, leading to the activation of one or more degree of freedom.…”
Section: Cartesian Force Limiting Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an important advantage since a collision can occur anywhere on the end-effector. In Lauzier et al (2009), this simple 1-DOF architecture was extended to a 2-DOF mechanism that reacts to collisions occuring in the whole horizontal plane. It is also possible to extend it to 3-DOF, thus covering all possible collisions occuring on the end-effector.…”
Section: Cartesian Force Limiting Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overall control algorithm process has a safety manager with an error handler that was designed with the help of a risk study.  The mechanical device that safely disconnects the user from the mechanism when the mechanism is out of control (Lauzier & Gosselin, 2009) and,  The safety tether which maintains the equilibrium of the user when walking, falling or when the mechanism is out of control (Ottaviano et al, 2008), (Grow & Hollerbach, 2006). Other safety aspects of the system must also be guaranteed.…”
Section: Human Safety and Security Management Planmentioning
confidence: 99%