2001
DOI: 10.1071/eg01156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2-D and 3-D IP/Resistivity Inversion for the Interpretation of Isa-Style Targets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, where geological constraints are not sufficient or geology is complex, 3D data are preferable, although the 3D field measurements are more costly and time consuming (Storz, Storz, and Jacobs ; Phillips et al . ; Rutley, Oldenburg, and Shekhtman ). Processing and interpretation of the 3D resistivity/IP data can be challenging, e.g., the inversion algorithms for processing the 3D resistivity/IP data allows the model resistivity values to vary in all three directions ( x , y , and z ), which is in contrast to the 2‐D inversions where the resistivity values vary in the x ‐and z ‐directions and are constant in the y ‐direction.…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, where geological constraints are not sufficient or geology is complex, 3D data are preferable, although the 3D field measurements are more costly and time consuming (Storz, Storz, and Jacobs ; Phillips et al . ; Rutley, Oldenburg, and Shekhtman ). Processing and interpretation of the 3D resistivity/IP data can be challenging, e.g., the inversion algorithms for processing the 3D resistivity/IP data allows the model resistivity values to vary in all three directions ( x , y , and z ), which is in contrast to the 2‐D inversions where the resistivity values vary in the x ‐and z ‐directions and are constant in the y ‐direction.…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, in areas with complex geological settings, such as complex changes in electrical parameters and target shapes caused by folds or magma intrusions, the information obtained by 2D data acquisition technology is insufficient [15]. Interpreting the real three-dimensional (3D) electrical structure is difficult and can result in drawing the wrong conclusions when using these data for interpretation in 2D inversion algorithms [16]. In addition, due to the non-uniform arrangement of particle pores and fractures in the rock, electrical anisotropy is possible [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%