2005
DOI: 10.4310/mrl.2005.v12.n4.a12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

$2$-adic properties of Hecke traces of singular moduli

Abstract: Abstract. In [Z], Zagier initiated a study of the function t 1 (d), the function which gives the trace of a singular modulus of discriminant −d < 0. Ahlgren and Ono [A-O, Theorem 1 (1)] proved that if p is an odd prime which splits in.30] asks for generalizations modulo arbitrary prime powers. We provide the answer for p = 2. In particular, we show, for all positive integers n and d, that t 1 (4 n · (8d + 7)) ≡ 0 (mod 2 · 16 n ).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For small primes one expects that more will be true. For example, Boylan [4] has given an elegant and precise description of the 2-adic properties of the numbers tr m (d). Finally, we mention that methods similar to those below have recently been used in joint work with Bringmann and Lovejoy [1] to study congruences for mock modular forms of weight 3/2 associated to various partition generating functions.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For small primes one expects that more will be true. For example, Boylan [4] has given an elegant and precise description of the 2-adic properties of the numbers tr m (d). Finally, we mention that methods similar to those below have recently been used in joint work with Bringmann and Lovejoy [1] to study congruences for mock modular forms of weight 3/2 associated to various partition generating functions.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when λ = 1 and 1 − λ = 0, Theorem 2.1 (3) and (4) shows that the class number summands obey the alleged duality. To complete the proof one simply observes that we may transform the formula for b λ (−m; n) into the formula for −b 1−λ (−n; m).…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An enormous amount of research has followed; while it is impossible to provide a complete list, we mention the papers [3,5,11,12,15,16,[24][25][26]29] as well as the references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%