2016
DOI: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.6b00022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2,8-Disubstituted-1,6-Naphthyridines and 4,6-Disubstituted-Isoquinolines with Potent, Selective Affinity for CDK8/19

Abstract: We demonstrate a designed scaffold-hop approach to the discovery of 2,8-disubstituted-1,6-naphthyridine- and 4,6-disubstituted-isoquinoline-based dual CDK8/19 ligands. Optimized compounds in both series exhibited rapid aldehyde oxidase-mediated metabolism, which could be abrogated by introduction of an amino substituent at C5 of the 1,6-naphthyridine scaffold or at C1 of the isoquinoline scaffold. Compounds 51 and 59 were progressed to in vivo pharmacokinetic studies, and 51 also demonstrated sustained inhibit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…During the optimisation of both the 3,4,5-trisubstituted pyridine and 3-methyl-1 H -pyrazolo[3,4- b ]pyridine series, we were unable to separate CDK8 from CDK19 affinity (Mallinger et al, 2015, 2016a; Czodrowski et al, 2016). This is also true for two additional distinct chemical series that we identified (Schiemann et al, 2016; Mallinger et al, 2016b), and also for a further three chemotypes we profiled from the literature, all of which demonstrated balanced CDK8 and CDK19 affinity in our hands. Similarly, the natural product cortistatin A cannot selectively distinguish between CDK8 and 19 (Pelish et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…During the optimisation of both the 3,4,5-trisubstituted pyridine and 3-methyl-1 H -pyrazolo[3,4- b ]pyridine series, we were unable to separate CDK8 from CDK19 affinity (Mallinger et al, 2015, 2016a; Czodrowski et al, 2016). This is also true for two additional distinct chemical series that we identified (Schiemann et al, 2016; Mallinger et al, 2016b), and also for a further three chemotypes we profiled from the literature, all of which demonstrated balanced CDK8 and CDK19 affinity in our hands. Similarly, the natural product cortistatin A cannot selectively distinguish between CDK8 and 19 (Pelish et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Moreover, considering their enzymatic activity, CDK19 and CDK8 might be more amenable to inhibition by small molecule compounds that Mediator subunits which exclusively act as transcription factors. Based on these observations, both CDK8 and CDK19 have emerged as promising therapeutic targets leading to the development of small molecule inhibitors impeding CDK8 and CDK19 activity …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these observations, both CDK8 and CDK19 have emerged as promising therapeutic targets leading to the development of small molecule inhibitors impeding CDK8 and CDK19 activity. 22,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35] In a recent systematic analysis of Mediator complex expression across all major cancer entities using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we identified high CDK19 RNA expression specifically in prostate cancer (PCa). 36 Subsequent in vitro experiments highlighted the potential functional implication of CDK19 in PCa progression mainly by promoting the metastatic potential of PCa cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the obvious importance of Mediator in gene expression control, little is known about shared and unique functions of the CDK-module paralogs. Recently, a number of dual inhibitors of CDK8 and CDK19 have been developed, including Cortistatin A, Senexin A, CCT251921 and MSC2530818 (Cee et al, 2009; Clarke et al, 2016; Czodrowski et al, 2016; Dale et al, 2015; Koehler et al, 2016; Mallinger et al, 2015; Mallinger et al, 2016a; Mallinger et al, 2016b; Porter et al, 2012; Schiemann et al, 2016). While many of these compounds appear to have efficacy against cancer cell lines in vitro , it remains unclear whether the effects are due to inhibition of CDK8, CDK19 or both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%