68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2006 2006
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201402363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2.5D Elastic Finite-Difference Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The seismic response is controlled by many factors such as the acoustic impedance and the lateral extent and thickness of the reservoir. Thus, to understand the time‐lapse seismic response of both travel‐time and amplitude changes, we perform a 2.5D elastic, finite‐difference modelling study that refers to a 3D wave propagation over a 2D model of the subsurface (Costa, Neto, and Novais ; Kostyukevych et al . ).…”
Section: Vertical Seismic Profile Data Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seismic response is controlled by many factors such as the acoustic impedance and the lateral extent and thickness of the reservoir. Thus, to understand the time‐lapse seismic response of both travel‐time and amplitude changes, we perform a 2.5D elastic, finite‐difference modelling study that refers to a 3D wave propagation over a 2D model of the subsurface (Costa, Neto, and Novais ; Kostyukevych et al . ).…”
Section: Vertical Seismic Profile Data Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%