2.5 Gbits/s burst mode receiver for NG-PON

Angeli, Bruno C. C.; Mobilon, Eduardo; Bordonalli, Aldário C.; Betou, Einar In de

doi:10.1109/imoc.2011.6169319

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several generations of standards and recommendations to communicate over these media have evolved over the last few decades. For passive optical networks (PONs), we have Broadband PON (BPON), Ethernet PON (EPON) [46], Gigabit PON (GPON), 10 Gigabit PON (XGPON) [85], and Next‐Generation XGPON (XGPON2) [2]; and for home networks there are standards that operate over copper, coaxial cables, and power lines. The default coding scheme calls for the use of (often interleaved) Reed‐Solomon (RS) codes.…”

Section: Coding In Optical Access Networkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Forward error correction in optical core and optical access networks

Schmalen¹,

Wijngaarden

Brink³

2013

Bell Labs Tech. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Forward error correction (FEC) techniques are essential for optical core and optical access networks. In optical core networks, the emphasis is on high coding gains and extremely low output bit error rates, while allowing decoder realizations to operate at a throughput of 100 Gb/s and above. Optical access networks operate at 10 Gb/s or above and require low‐complexity FEC codes with low power consumption. Coherent optical transmission with higher order modulation formats will become mandatory to achieve the high spectral efficiencies required in next‐generation core networks. In this paper, we provide an overview of these requirements and techniques, and highlight how coding and modulation can be best combined in optical core networks. We also present guidelines for modulation and low‐complexity FEC system design for optical access networks. © 2013 Alcatel‐Lucent.

show abstract

Section: Coding In Optical Access Networkmentioning

confidence: 99%