2017 Wireless Days 2017
DOI: 10.1109/wd.2017.7918132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2.4 GHz single anchor node indoor localization system with angle of arrival fingerprinting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PSs in [20] and [21] use isotropic antennas, which are significantly affected by multipath, causing large errors. The research in [22] and [24] have the advantage of simple configuration because the system only uses one node, but the positioning area cannot be expanded, so it can only be used in narrow rooms. The location accuracy in [23] is also higher than in the proposed PS, but the number of nodes in [20] is 4, which is larger than in the PS in our work.…”
Section: Related Work and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PSs in [20] and [21] use isotropic antennas, which are significantly affected by multipath, causing large errors. The research in [22] and [24] have the advantage of simple configuration because the system only uses one node, but the positioning area cannot be expanded, so it can only be used in narrow rooms. The location accuracy in [23] is also higher than in the proposed PS, but the number of nodes in [20] is 4, which is larger than in the PS in our work.…”
Section: Related Work and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [23], a location area expansion requires an increase in the number of nodes, while it is not necessary for the proposed PS. For the fingerprint method, [24] uses SA radiated horizontally to both sides, so the system adds a screen at the back of the antenna to avoid causing a complicated multipath phenomenon that makes the PS complex. Based on the proposed antenna, we have a threenode PS based on the Zigbee standard.…”
Section: Related Work and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though fingerprinting method results with promising location estimation outcome, signal map creation is time-consuming and requires to be repeated even when there is a small change in the physical setting. In addition to RSSI-based location estimation using Wi-Fi, 17 researchers have also conducted studies on localization techniques using angle of arrival (AoA), 18 time of arrival (ToA), 19 and time difference of arrival (TDoA). 20 With the recent proliferation of smartphones with Bluetooth low energy (BLE) that can communicate with other devices and affordable off-the-shelf signal-emitting beacons, the dominance of Wi-Fi use for indoor location sensing is greatly challenged.…”
Section: Location Estimation and Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AoA parameter is used in ref. [18,19] for localization.  Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI): The distance between source and receiver can be determined from the received signal strength using theoretical or empirical model.…”
Section: Indirect Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Network Dynamics: In general, the nodes in the network are assumed to be stationary. But in fewapplications, acertain amount of mobility is needed for few nodes, and even the base station [19]. In such cases sending or receiving messages to/from such mobile nodes are highly difficult.…”
Section: Routing Challenges and Issues In Wsnmentioning
confidence: 99%