31st Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 1995
DOI: 10.2514/6.1995-2516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2.3 kW ion thruster wear test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During a 2000-h wear test of an NSTAR engineering model thruster (EMT1), significant erosion of the hollow cathode was observed. 3 An engineering solution to this problem was to include an enclosed keeper electrode into the design. This was found almost to eliminate cathode orifice plate erosion during a subsequent 1000-h wear test.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During a 2000-h wear test of an NSTAR engineering model thruster (EMT1), significant erosion of the hollow cathode was observed. 3 An engineering solution to this problem was to include an enclosed keeper electrode into the design. This was found almost to eliminate cathode orifice plate erosion during a subsequent 1000-h wear test.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early ion thrusters exhibited higher rates of erosion on the screen grids, 7 but subsequent operational changes to the NSTAR thruster related to the screen grid potential and discharge voltage have significantly reduced the wear of the screen grid. The NSTAR screen grid apertures only exhibited slight chamfering on the upstream side during the 8200 hour test 6 and less than 60 µm of chamfering during the NSTAR ELT.…”
Section: E Screen Grid Erosionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early in the NSTAR program, the thruster was wear-tested without a keeper and severe erosion of the cathode orifice plate and heater ocurred. 7 Subsequent to that test, a sacrificial keeper was added to protect the cathode. 8 Once the keeper is sufficiently eroded to constitute its end of life, the cathode and heater are exposed and their erosion rates dramatically increase, but the keeper end of life would not result in the end of life of the thruster.…”
Section: Keeper Wearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous ion engine wear tests revealed unanticipated wear mechanisms [16,17,18]. Experimental evaluations form the backbone of the NEXT validation process and are essential to life demonstration.…”
Section: Thruster Life Testing and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%