Comprehensive Biophysics 2012
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-374920-8.00203-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2.2 Confocal Microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…660, Invitrogen P7220) provided an FWHM of 1.1 µm laterally and 6.2 µm axially. This compares to theoretical values of (0.51*λ) / ((√2)*NA)  = 484 nm laterally and (0.64* λ) / (n-√(n2-NA2))  = 1.7 µm axially [21], [22]. Latex beads did not generate a suitable THG signal.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…660, Invitrogen P7220) provided an FWHM of 1.1 µm laterally and 6.2 µm axially. This compares to theoretical values of (0.51*λ) / ((√2)*NA)  = 484 nm laterally and (0.64* λ) / (n-√(n2-NA2))  = 1.7 µm axially [21], [22]. Latex beads did not generate a suitable THG signal.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Fluorescence labelling combined confocal microscopy has become a powerful tool in daily use in bioscience laboratories throughout the world (see, e.g. Wilson & Sheppard, 1984; Wilson, 1990; Pawley, 1995; Diaspro, 2001; Amos et al , 2011). The main reason for the popularity of these instruments is that the confocal microscope, unlike its conventional counterpart, has the ability to image well only detail that arises from the regions of the specimen which lie close to the focal plane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, aberrations do not negatively affect the axial resolution within uncertainty limits. In order to evaluate the HiLo microscope against state-of-the-art techniques, the axial resolution of classical confocal and widefield microscopy are calculated according to [28] …”
Section: Spatial Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%