Abstract:This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work; to adapt the work and to make commercial use of the work providing attribution is made to the editors (but not in any way that suggests that the endorse you or your use of the work).Attribution should include the following information:
Digitalization is becoming a priority in the development of the public governance system, and the question arises about the effectiveness and efficiency of management with the introduction of quantitative methods. This article presents a meta-analysis of relevant studies of quantitative methods that are used in the global practice of public administration. The purpose of the study: to determine a set of quantitative methods that will be necessary and sufficient in the decision-making arsenal of a public executive. A selection of two dozen articles was obtained during systematized research and grouped according to the criteria of compliance with a certain quantitative method and compared with the general potential of quantitative methods in relation to public administration. As a result, a classification of quantitative methods is proposed divided into three global classes of mathematical tools, namely, empirical, logical, and special methods. Methods from the classification are correlated with their potential areas of application in public administration. The authors concluded that it is necessary to increase the research, differentiate effective quantitative methods and introduce the necessary special training of managers for the rational application of quantitative methods in the public sphere.
Digitalization is becoming a priority in the development of the public governance system, and the question arises about the effectiveness and efficiency of management with the introduction of quantitative methods. This article presents a meta-analysis of relevant studies of quantitative methods that are used in the global practice of public administration. The purpose of the study: to determine a set of quantitative methods that will be necessary and sufficient in the decision-making arsenal of a public executive. A selection of two dozen articles was obtained during systematized research and grouped according to the criteria of compliance with a certain quantitative method and compared with the general potential of quantitative methods in relation to public administration. As a result, a classification of quantitative methods is proposed divided into three global classes of mathematical tools, namely, empirical, logical, and special methods. Methods from the classification are correlated with their potential areas of application in public administration. The authors concluded that it is necessary to increase the research, differentiate effective quantitative methods and introduce the necessary special training of managers for the rational application of quantitative methods in the public sphere.
This chapter aims to discuss the EU's cyber security strategy and how its policy is capable of restricting cybercrime in Europe. The study explains the role of EU Member States in dealing with cybercrime in this region. This research draws on qualitative comparative analysis to examine various EU initiatives to tackle cybercrime issues in Europe. Furthermore, this chapter discusses the core literature of primary and secondary resources through an empirical approach. Since globalisation reached its highest level across the world, the question of cyber security has emerged as a key area of multiple cooperation between the global actors. Cybercrime is now a complex issue among the global actors to restrict its expansion. The EU also started cooperation with Asian, American, and African countries on cybercrime issues. Finally, this chapter suggests that cybercrime is the central area of cooperation between the global actors to restrict it which is dangerous for humanity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.