2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1H NMR spectroscopic identification of a glue sniffing biomarker

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ease of quantitation and high reproducibility (Kwon et al 2011) Many of the ∆ 9 -THC activities depend on the interaction with cannabinoid receptors (CB) (Lichtman and Martin 1996). Currently, two CB receptors have been identified, CB 1 and CB 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ease of quantitation and high reproducibility (Kwon et al 2011) Many of the ∆ 9 -THC activities depend on the interaction with cannabinoid receptors (CB) (Lichtman and Martin 1996). Currently, two CB receptors have been identified, CB 1 and CB 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since volatile substances made up the major composition of adhesives, headspace method coupled with gas chromatography technique has been extensively carried out [6,[16][17][18][19][20]. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy was also reported in detecting chemical compounds in solvent-based adhesives through glue sniffing biomarker [21]. Most literatures mainly reported the effect of volatile compounds from toxicological aspects, while literature on the analysis on solvent-based adhesive is lacking, though it can become important physical evidence in related forensic cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dr. Kim will confirm the metabolic pathways causing those differences in future work. For the forensic applications, he analyzed urine from an individual with a history of sniffing glue using NMRbased metabolomics (Kwon et al 2011). Toluene is the main solvent ingredient of glue, but it is not soluble in water and is difficult to detect in biofluid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%