“…The 13 C NMR spectra of the Schiff base ligands ( L1 , L2 , L3 ) and their Zn(II) complexes were taken in DMSO‐d 6 . The 13 C NMR spectral data are reported along with their possible assignments in the Experimental section and all the carbons were found in their expected region . The conclusions drawn from these studies provided further support to the modes of bonding already explained in the IR and 1 H NMR spectral data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Conversely, the same proton C 4 ‐ H of ligand L3 was observed downfield at 7.85 ppm due to the presence of the electron‐withdrawing effect of the NO 2 group at the 5‐ position. A broad singlet displayed the N H proton of triazole at 13.95–14.20 ppm in all the ligands. The coordination of the azomethine (C H ═N) nitrogen and C═N of the triazole ring nitrogen was assigned by the downfield shifting of azomethine (C 6 ‐ H ) and triazole (C 8 ‐ H) protons present originally at 8.90–9.25 and 8.40–8.62 ppm in the free ligands, which moved to 9.33–9.63 and 8.78–8.96 ppm in the spectra of their zinc(II) complexes, respectively.…”
New metal based triazoles (1-12) have been synthesized by the interaction of novel Schiff base ligands (L 1 -L 3 ) with the Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II) metal ions. The Schiff base ligands and their all metal(II) complexes have been thoroughly characterized using various physical, analytical and spectroscopic techniques. In vitro bacterial and fungal inhibition studies were carried out to examine the antibacterial and antifungal profile of the Schiff bases in comparison to their metal(II) complexes against two Gram-positive, four Gram-negative and six fungal strains. The bioactivity data showed the metal(II) complexes to have more potent antibacterial and antifungal activity than their uncomplexed parent Schiff bases against one or more bacterial and fungal species. R Scheme 1. Preparation of the Schiff base ligands (L 1 -L 3 ). Scheme 2. Proposed structure of the metal(II) complexes (1-12).Synthesis, triazole Schiff bases, metal complexes, biological activity Average of ligands (L 1 -L 3 ) = 13.47 mm; average of complexes (1-12) = 17.24 mm.
“…The 13 C NMR spectra of the Schiff base ligands ( L1 , L2 , L3 ) and their Zn(II) complexes were taken in DMSO‐d 6 . The 13 C NMR spectral data are reported along with their possible assignments in the Experimental section and all the carbons were found in their expected region . The conclusions drawn from these studies provided further support to the modes of bonding already explained in the IR and 1 H NMR spectral data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Conversely, the same proton C 4 ‐ H of ligand L3 was observed downfield at 7.85 ppm due to the presence of the electron‐withdrawing effect of the NO 2 group at the 5‐ position. A broad singlet displayed the N H proton of triazole at 13.95–14.20 ppm in all the ligands. The coordination of the azomethine (C H ═N) nitrogen and C═N of the triazole ring nitrogen was assigned by the downfield shifting of azomethine (C 6 ‐ H ) and triazole (C 8 ‐ H) protons present originally at 8.90–9.25 and 8.40–8.62 ppm in the free ligands, which moved to 9.33–9.63 and 8.78–8.96 ppm in the spectra of their zinc(II) complexes, respectively.…”
New metal based triazoles (1-12) have been synthesized by the interaction of novel Schiff base ligands (L 1 -L 3 ) with the Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II) metal ions. The Schiff base ligands and their all metal(II) complexes have been thoroughly characterized using various physical, analytical and spectroscopic techniques. In vitro bacterial and fungal inhibition studies were carried out to examine the antibacterial and antifungal profile of the Schiff bases in comparison to their metal(II) complexes against two Gram-positive, four Gram-negative and six fungal strains. The bioactivity data showed the metal(II) complexes to have more potent antibacterial and antifungal activity than their uncomplexed parent Schiff bases against one or more bacterial and fungal species. R Scheme 1. Preparation of the Schiff base ligands (L 1 -L 3 ). Scheme 2. Proposed structure of the metal(II) complexes (1-12).Synthesis, triazole Schiff bases, metal complexes, biological activity Average of ligands (L 1 -L 3 ) = 13.47 mm; average of complexes (1-12) = 17.24 mm.
“…They further concluded that the electronegativity of the different substituents that are attached to the phenyl ring, had a marked effect on the intramolecular charge-transfer (CT) within the molecules in question. They confirmed their results by the different schemes of fragmentation in the mass spectral analysis [12].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…All the chemicals used were analytical grade from either Fluka (Germany) or Aldrich (USA), whereas, the heterocyclic Schiff bases were prepared according to a previously reported method [12].…”
“…Synthesis of N-salicylidene-3-amino-1,2,4-triazole SAT was synthesized according to the reported method in reference [26]. A solution of salicylaldehyde (4.80 g, 0.04 mol) dissolved in ethanol (10 mL) was added to a solution of 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (3.44 g, 0.04 mol) in ethanol (10 mL).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.