2005
DOI: 10.1002/mrc.1578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1H and13C NMR data to aid the identification and quantification of residual solvents by NMR spectroscopy

Abstract: We present reference data and a javascript web page which allow the rapid identification and quantification of residual solvents by NMR. The data encompass all of the ICH-prescribed solvents and were obtained for a number of NMR solvents. We also present an example of its application.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(4 reference statements)
5
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MS m / z (%): 150 (30), 135 (100), 107 (20), 92 (24), 77 (38), 64 (18), 43(15). The spectral data matched with the previous reports [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…MS m / z (%): 150 (30), 135 (100), 107 (20), 92 (24), 77 (38), 64 (18), 43(15). The spectral data matched with the previous reports [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…1 H chemical shifts in DMSO can differ by up to 5 ppm from the corresponding shifts in CDCl 3 and therefore, the calculations for CDCl 3 cannot be used with confidence to predict chemical shifts in DMSO. Few detailed studies of the effects of DMSO on 1 H chemical shifts have been carried out. Gottlieb et al 15 gave the 1 H (and 13 C) chemical shifts of 36 common impurities in seven common solvents and, more recently, Jones et al 16 recorded similar data for 60 common solvents in CDCl 3 , DMSO, D 2 O and CD 3 OD. GlaxoWellcome 17a and Pfizer 17b have produced pamphlets with the 1 H shifts of ca 50 common compounds in the same four solvents.…”
Section: S Shielding Nomenclature ( ))mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Integrated peaks of parent were compared with those of the standard. The integrals of interest used in the purity calculation were the CH at 8.06 ppm on the methyl imidazole ring for the MDZG and one of the protons at 5.2 ppm from the CH 2 and used to give a purity figure of the sample using [16]:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%