2019
DOI: 10.1364/ol.44.003853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1D time evolving electric field profile measurements with sub-ns resolution using the E-FISH method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important difference between eqns. (8) and ( 9) is that while the power contained in the probe beam is necessarily constant (assuming negligible depletion), the E-FISH power is in fact a function of .…”
Section: Governing Equations For a Focused Gaussian Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important difference between eqns. (8) and ( 9) is that while the power contained in the probe beam is necessarily constant (assuming negligible depletion), the E-FISH power is in fact a function of .…”
Section: Governing Equations For a Focused Gaussian Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, much attention is paid to measurements of electric fields inside APPJs. For this purpose, various methods have been used, based on the intensity ratio of the first negative and second positive systems of N 2 radiation [5], polarisation‐dependent Stark splitting and shifting of visible helium lines [611], Pockels technique [1214], electric field‐induced second harmonic generation method [15, 16]. A number of measurements give, in the region of effluent adjacent to the tube end, nearly linear growth of the electric field along the helium APPJ axis [6, 811, 16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable progress has been made in electric field measurements by picosecond laser techniques of E-field measurements. We can mention four-wave mixing [119] and the Electric Field-Induced Second Harmonic (E-FISH) generation technique [120,121]. Time resolution is limited by the laser pulse duration and the registration technique (e.g., oscilloscope bandwidth) and is typically sub-nanosecond.…”
Section: Plasma-assisted Ignitionmentioning
confidence: 99%