2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2016.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1D-spectral editing and 2D multispectral in vivo 1 H-MRS and 1 H-MRSI - Methods and applications

Abstract: This article reviews the methodological aspects of detecting low-abundant J-coupled metabolites via 1D spectral editing techniques and 2D nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) methods applied in vivo, in humans, with a focus on the brain. A brief explanation of the basics of J-evolution will be followed by an introduction to 1D spectral editing techniques (e.g., J-difference editing, multiple quantum coherence filtering) and 2D-NMR methods (e.g., correlation spectroscopy, J-resolved spectroscopy). Established and r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
1
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, associations between metabolite measurements, or their uncertainty, and SNR and/or linewidth are widely observed in investigations of linear combination modeling of unedited spectra (Bartha et al, 2007; Kanowski et al, 2004; Near et al, 2013a). With spectral editing, the goal is to attain an unambiguously resolved signal that allows for simple peak fitting and integration (Bogner et al, 2016; Harris et al, 2017), but with (short-TE) unedited spectra quantification is based on linear-combination fitting, the outcome of which depends on the degree of orthogonality of the basis-set, which itself depends on data quality (Graveron-Demilly, 2014). Although edited MRS of lower-concentration metabolites typically necessitates comparatively longer scan durations or larger voxels to achieve reasonable SNR, the advent of multiplexed editing (Chan et al, 2016, 2017a, 2017b; Oeltzschner et al, 2017; Saleh et al, 2016) and development of edited MRSI (Bogner et al, 2014; Hnilicová et al, 2016; Zhu et al, 2011) continues to improve the efficiency of spectral editing approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, associations between metabolite measurements, or their uncertainty, and SNR and/or linewidth are widely observed in investigations of linear combination modeling of unedited spectra (Bartha et al, 2007; Kanowski et al, 2004; Near et al, 2013a). With spectral editing, the goal is to attain an unambiguously resolved signal that allows for simple peak fitting and integration (Bogner et al, 2016; Harris et al, 2017), but with (short-TE) unedited spectra quantification is based on linear-combination fitting, the outcome of which depends on the degree of orthogonality of the basis-set, which itself depends on data quality (Graveron-Demilly, 2014). Although edited MRS of lower-concentration metabolites typically necessitates comparatively longer scan durations or larger voxels to achieve reasonable SNR, the advent of multiplexed editing (Chan et al, 2016, 2017a, 2017b; Oeltzschner et al, 2017; Saleh et al, 2016) and development of edited MRSI (Bogner et al, 2014; Hnilicová et al, 2016; Zhu et al, 2011) continues to improve the efficiency of spectral editing approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent reviews have covered editing, provided practical guides for high‐field spectroscopy, and recommendations for experimental and analysis details based on consensus . No recent review, however, has provided an in‐depth analysis and comparison of all commonly used MRS pulse sequences and their potential applications beyond standard concentration estimation.…”
Section: Critical Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For intuitively understanding a pulse sequence, the full density matrix formalism provides little insight, as the results of sequences are computed numerically, whereas the product operator formalism, although not strictly valid because it assumes ideal pulses and weak coupling, can be used to obtain a deep understanding of the mechanisms by which complex modern MRS pulse sequences operate. Readers who wish to familiarize themselves with the product operator and density matrix formalisms are directed to the comprehensive textbook Spin Dynamics or other review articles that cover the topic in further depth . As the purpose of this article is to provide insight into modern MRS sequences, the product operator formalism is the natural choice.…”
Section: Critical Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DQF 1 H MRS in human brain have largely been limited to methods development in healthy controls, although applications in patients with seizure disorders have been reported 26,27 . Technical details regarding MQC spin dynamics and DQF pulse sequences can be found elsewhere 28 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%