1999
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1999)125:8(827)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1D Modeling of Mud/Debris Unsteady Flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A disadvantage of this approach is that it cannot reproduce the cessation of motion on gently sloping surfaces. Nevertheless, Costa (1997) and Jin and Fread (1999) showed that the flow depth and the velocity of debris flows, can be simulated reasonably well within the channel, after calibration of appropriate pseudo Manning n values. For many natural debris flows both mean grain size and solid concentration tend to decrease upstream of the front, suggesting that the flow may become either turbulent or viscous upstream of the front.…”
Section: H Coulomb Viscousmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A disadvantage of this approach is that it cannot reproduce the cessation of motion on gently sloping surfaces. Nevertheless, Costa (1997) and Jin and Fread (1999) showed that the flow depth and the velocity of debris flows, can be simulated reasonably well within the channel, after calibration of appropriate pseudo Manning n values. For many natural debris flows both mean grain size and solid concentration tend to decrease upstream of the front, suggesting that the flow may become either turbulent or viscous upstream of the front.…”
Section: H Coulomb Viscousmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Jin and Fread, 1999;Hungr, 1995;Fraccarollo and Papa, 2000;Laigle and Coussot, 1997). In this work the continuity and momentum equations are written in the conservative form:…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In these conditions the total stress on the bed would be equal to the hydrostatic stresses plus the static/dispersive stresses due to contacts/collisions among particles. In these conditions the term (∂p bed /∂x) (Iverson, 1997(Iverson, , 2000Jin and Fread, 1999) tends to be equal to zero and the pore pressure distribution tends to be hydrostatic. A hydrostatic distribution of the pore pressure is a basic assumption of many rheological models (Takahashi, 1991;Egashira et al, 1997) that imply resistance to flow formulas similar to Eq.…”
Section: The Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%