SAE Technical Paper Series 2019
DOI: 10.4271/2019-24-0132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1D Modeling of Alternative Fuels Spray in a Compression Ignition Engine Using Injection Rate Shaping Strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the event of multiple injections such as pilot or post injections, the model presents no substantial modifications to the described scheme and subsequent sprays are injected on the same numerical domain. This assumption is a simplification compared to experimental studies that show that cones of successive injections are slightly wider, 40 as modeled in Skeen et al 32 and Mancaruso et al 41 However, this simplification is adopted for at least three reasons: (a) changing the numerical domain could result in numerical instabilities in the computation of the multi-zone mass exchanges; (b) the modification of the cone between injections is still a matter of active research, thus it is quantitively still unclear for real-engine applications; (c) the authors observed that even keeping the same spreading angle, the overall effect on combustion is still well captured (as discussed for the ECN Spray A with split injection experiment at the beginning of the results section).…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the event of multiple injections such as pilot or post injections, the model presents no substantial modifications to the described scheme and subsequent sprays are injected on the same numerical domain. This assumption is a simplification compared to experimental studies that show that cones of successive injections are slightly wider, 40 as modeled in Skeen et al 32 and Mancaruso et al 41 However, this simplification is adopted for at least three reasons: (a) changing the numerical domain could result in numerical instabilities in the computation of the multi-zone mass exchanges; (b) the modification of the cone between injections is still a matter of active research, thus it is quantitively still unclear for real-engine applications; (c) the authors observed that even keeping the same spreading angle, the overall effect on combustion is still well captured (as discussed for the ECN Spray A with split injection experiment at the beginning of the results section).…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%