2004
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-4-40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: Background: The phylogenetic relationships among the holoparasites of Rafflesiales have remained enigmatic for over a century. Recent molecular phylogenetic studies using the mitochondrial matR gene placed Rafflesia, Rhizanthes and Sapria (Rafflesiaceae s. str.) in the angiosperm order Malpighiales and Mitrastema (Mitrastemonaceae) in Ericales. These phylogenetic studies did not, however, sample two additional groups traditionally classified within Rafflesiales (Apodantheaceae and Cytinaceae). Here we provide … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, a disproportionately large number of the reported HGT events involve parasitic plants (Mower et al 2004, Davis andWurdack 2004;Nickrent et al 2004;Davis et al 2005), providing evidence for direct plant-to-plant transmission of DNA from parasite to host as one potential mechanism of HGT in plants. While some Cuscuta species were explicitly involved in one of those events of HGT (Mower et al 2004), it is highly unlikely that any of the five instances of incongruence encountered in the present study could be explained by these means.…”
Section: Alternative Explanations For the Observed Plastid-nuclear DImentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Moreover, a disproportionately large number of the reported HGT events involve parasitic plants (Mower et al 2004, Davis andWurdack 2004;Nickrent et al 2004;Davis et al 2005), providing evidence for direct plant-to-plant transmission of DNA from parasite to host as one potential mechanism of HGT in plants. While some Cuscuta species were explicitly involved in one of those events of HGT (Mower et al 2004), it is highly unlikely that any of the five instances of incongruence encountered in the present study could be explained by these means.…”
Section: Alternative Explanations For the Observed Plastid-nuclear DImentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This is a plausible explanation because plant mitochondrial genes are sometimes exchanged between species [17-20], and most known cases of HGT come from parasitic plants, which have permanent tissue contact with their hosts [8,16,21-24]. Even nuclear DNA can be transferred between parasites and their hosts [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acquired genes may also be derived from different donor groups including viruses, bacteria, fungi, and other plants [6,33,57,58]. Many other cases of HGT have been reported in land plants, but cannot be detailed here [37,52,[59][60][61][62][63][64]. To sum up, while HGT in plants may not be as frequent as in prokaryotes or unicellular eukaryotes, it still plays an important role in some essential or plant-specific activities and has had a significant impact on the evolution of land plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%