1992
DOI: 10.2737/ne-rp-669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1992 Data Bank for Red Oak Lumber

Abstract: The 1992 Data Bank for Red Oak Lumber is a collection of fully described FAS, Selects, No.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of its importance to the industry (Espinoza et al 2011) and the availability of a large data bank of digitized boards, red oak, Quercus rubra, was used for this study (Gatchell et al 1998). Listed in order from highest to lowest grade quality (NHLA 2011), the grades or the grade mixes used were: 1) 100% FAS; 2) 50% FAS/50% 1 common; 3) 100% 1 common; 4) 25% FAS/25% 1 common/50% 2A common; 5) 50% 1 common/50% 2 common; 6) 100% 2A common; and 7) 67% 1 common/33% 3A common.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because of its importance to the industry (Espinoza et al 2011) and the availability of a large data bank of digitized boards, red oak, Quercus rubra, was used for this study (Gatchell et al 1998). Listed in order from highest to lowest grade quality (NHLA 2011), the grades or the grade mixes used were: 1) 100% FAS; 2) 50% FAS/50% 1 common; 3) 100% 1 common; 4) 25% FAS/25% 1 common/50% 2A common; 5) 50% 1 common/50% 2 common; 6) 100% 2A common; and 7) 67% 1 common/33% 3A common.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Listed in order from highest to lowest grade quality (NHLA 2011), the grades or the grade mixes used were: 1) 100% FAS; 2) 50% FAS/50% 1 common; 3) 100% 1 common; 4) 25% FAS/25% 1 common/50% 2A common; 5) 50% 1 common/50% 2 common; 6) 100% 2A common; and 7) 67% 1 common/33% 3A common. Each grade mixed sample was replicated 10 times, with each being a random sample from the entire kiln-dried red oak data bank (Gatchell et al 1998;Buehlmann and Zuo 2008). Each cutting bill was processed once using each processing method (rip-first, crosscut-first, and dual-line), and each of the 10 random digital lumber samples for each lumber grade mix for each cutting bill.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This window is where you choose files containing digitized boards from the databank ). The top box shows the available board files (see Gatchell et al 1998 for more information about the content of each board file) and the bottom box shows the selected board files to use. To choose a board file, double click on the name of the file and it will be shown in the bottom box.…”
Section: Customize Boarddata For Datafile Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…You also have the ability to see the width class (e.g., the class-wise distribution of widths, rounded to the next inch, Gatchell et al 1998) over standard length distribution of a chosen board data set by clicking on the Data Graph button. Figure 5.2.8 shows the width class of a standard length distribution of a 1 Common board data set based on the 1998 Gatchell database ).…”
Section: Custom Grade MIXmentioning
confidence: 99%