1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(96)67021-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[19] Affinity selection-amplification from randomized ribooligonucleotide pools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
95
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fifty-microliter fractions were collected, and the first two fractions containing the leading edge of the liposome peak (detected by OD 320 ) were pooled. Liposomes were disrupted by 5-min incubation at room temperature with 0.1% Triton X-100, and RNA was precipitated with ethanol and processed as described (7). Triton X-100 was used because the chloroform extraction used previously (2) leads to loss of RNA into the interphase.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifty-microliter fractions were collected, and the first two fractions containing the leading edge of the liposome peak (detected by OD 320 ) were pooled. Liposomes were disrupted by 5-min incubation at room temperature with 0.1% Triton X-100, and RNA was precipitated with ethanol and processed as described (7). Triton X-100 was used because the chloroform extraction used previously (2) leads to loss of RNA into the interphase.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bound RNAs were eluted with 1 mL of L-isoleucine containing buffer after washing with 5-7.5 column volumes of selection buffer. The number of template DNA sequences implies a mean of ∼ 60,000 copies of each 16-mer sequence and 19 copies of each possible 22-mer transcribed, so there is a low probability, ∼ 10 −9 (Poisson probability of zero copies, P(0) = e −19 ≈ 6 × 10 −9 ; Ciesiolka et al 1996) that any contiguous 22-mer sequence was absent. Therefore, the design of the experiments implies that any simpler 16-mer or 22-mer isoleucine site, if it exists, should be present at the start of these selections, perhaps many times over.…”
Section: Selections With Limited Numbers Of Randomized Nucleotidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of diverse activities from randomized RNA is relevant to the hypothesis of an RNA World (Gilbert 1986), in which it has been suggested that selection from varied, mostly nonfunctional sequences may have been a principal mode of biological evolution (Yarus 2002). This idea makes the simplest active RNA for all reactions of particular evolutionary interest, as the site requiring the fewest nucleotides should be most numerous in initial pools of randomized sequence (Ciesiolka et al 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNA sequences bound to human eRF1 were isolated by filter binding using mixed cellulose ester MF-Millipore filters (catalog #HAWP02500)+ RNA pools were prepared for selection by passage through two filters in the absence of protein to eliminate filter-binding RNAs+ Then each round of selection comprised three binding reactions containing 0, 15, or 60 pmol eRF1 and 750 pmol RNA incubated at 37 8C for 4 min in 200 mL binding buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7+5, 2 mM MgCl 2 , 40 mM NH 4 Cl, 10 mM KCl)+ MF-Millipore filters in a Millipore 1225 sampling manifold were prewashed with 1 mL of binding buffer, the binding reaction was applied, and the filters were washed with 2 mL binding buffer+ RNA retained on the filter was detected by Cerenkov scintillation+ The filter with the greatest ratio of bound radioactivity to a control with no protein was carried forward+ RNA was extracted from this filter with 1 mL of a 2:1 mixture of phenol (equilibrated to pH 8):8 M urea at room temperature for 30 min+ Water (400 mL) was added and the aqueous phase was ethanol precipitated and RNA was resuspended in water+ Reverse transcription and PCR amplification were performed by standard methods (e+g+, Ciesiolka et al+, 1996)+ After nine rounds of selection, cDNAs of the selected pool of RNAs were digested with BamHI and HindIII, cloned into the matching sites of pGEM3Zfϩ (Promega), and sequenced (Fig+ 1A)+…”
Section: Selection For Aptamers Binding To Erf1mentioning
confidence: 99%